No, you can't get a refund, no it isn't censorship, no it isn't literally 1984.

[AggressiveHibernation]

Just a friendly reminder for any far-right Trump supporters still review bombing Skullgirls:

- Stop lying about "cOnSuMeR pRoTeCtiOn", no country in the world allows for a legal complaint against a company for removing child porn art

- No you can't get a refund because the devs removed child porn art

- No it's not "censorship" to remove child porn art

- No, it's not "literally 1984" to remove child porn art

- Blackrock isn't coming to attack your indie games, a fake anti-semitic conspiracy theory isn't an argument

- No, objectively by definition, removing child porn art doesn't magically somehow mean "omg the devs support child porn"...because they REMOVED it and you're the one advocating for it

- If your argument consists of attacking BLM, defending the freakin' KKK (literally, you did this) and declaring Wikipedia is biased against Nazis in order to defend child porn art, then you actually have no argument

---

On a related note, a bunch of right-wingers came into the thread and began SPAMMING defence for child porn art.

A user by the name of DieOne17 began desperately defending the inclusion of child porn in this game. He is also the user Sunohara and Ryugin55, He was losing so hard trying (and failing) to debate me over my opposition to child porn that he had to use his alt accounts to SPAM the thread.

He got caught out when he replied as the wrong account after asking for child porn photos as DieOne17 instead of Sunohara. "Mysteriously" Sunohara stopped replying after that mistake. He then took his other alt account Ryugin55 and began the same SPAM defence he already tried with Sunohara. Failing that he also accidentally admitted to using his alt account instead of DieOne17.

Originally posted by ryugin55:

whoops wrong account sorry

[𝙈𝙚𝙜𝙖𝙡𝙤]

Originally posted by AggressiveHibernation:

Just a friendly reminder for any far-right Trump supporters still review bombing Skullgirls:

- Stop lying about "cOnSuMeR pRoTeCtiOn", no country in the world allows for a legal complaint against a company for removing child porn art

- No you can't get a refund because the devs removed child porn art

- No it's not "censorship" to remove child porn art

- No, it's not "literally 1984" to remove child porn art

- Blackrock isn't coming to attack your indie games, a fake anti-semitic conspiracy theory isn't an argument

- No, objectively by definition, removing child porn art doesn't magically somehow mean "omg the devs support child porn"...because they REMOVED it and you're the one advocating for it

- If your argument consists of attacking BLM, defending the freakin' KKK (literally, you did this) and declaring Wikipedia is biased against Nazis in order to defend child porn art, then you actually have no argument

You're implying that Sony, Steam, Microsoft, and now recently Nintendo willingly distributed and marketed child pron for 10 yrs. Good job chief.

[AggressiveHibernation]

Originally posted by 𝙈𝙖𝙞𝙠𝙪:

willingly distributed and marketed child pron

Notice how these review bombers keep outright lying. He's blocked me too, thinking I can't read his post.

- No, objectively by definition, removing child porn art doesn't magically somehow mean "omg the devs support child porn"...because they REMOVED it and you're the one advocating for it

[Seraphita]

There is so much wrong with this thread, I don't even know where to begin. People like OP mislabeling fictional characters as "child porn" is among the top ones of the list, anyway. Usually people accusing others of being pedos are projecting so take it as you wish...

[AggressiveHibernation]

Originally posted by Seraphita:

Usually people accusing others of being pedos are projecting so take it as you wish...

Every right-wing attack is a projection.

Somehow being anit-child porn art, while they actively advocate for it, means i'm "projecting" and want child porn art in the game. Incredible.

Sorry, you guys already tried and failed that fallacy.

[𝙈𝙚𝙜𝙖𝙡𝙤]

Originally posted by AggressiveHibernation:

Originally posted by 𝙈𝙖𝙞𝙠𝙪:

willingly distributed and marketed child pron

Notice how these review bombers keep outright lying. He's blocked me too, thinking I can't read his post.

- No, objectively by definition, removing child porn art doesn't magically somehow mean "omg the devs support child porn"...because they REMOVED it and you're the one advocating for it

i havent said anything about advocating child pron. why are you already making false and belligerent accusations? you never addressed my 1st statement. You only referred to "review bombers".

[Seraphita]

Originally posted by AggressiveHibernation:

Originally posted by Seraphita:

Usually people accusing others of being pedos are projecting so take it as you wish...

Every right-wing attack is a projection.

Somehow being anit-child porn art, while they actively advocate for it, means i'm "projecting" and want child porn art in the game. Incredible.

Sorry, you guys already tried and failed that fallacy.

You're anti "fictional characters", let's not confuse things. Nobody here is advocating for child porn which does not exist in this game. Because, well, it's a game... with fictional characters. The fact that your thread is based on this nonsense means YOU have no arguments...

Also do check how characters were changed. It was censored by definition... That is all.

[AggressiveHibernation]

Originally posted by 𝙈𝙖𝙞𝙠𝙪:

i havent said anything about advocating child pron.

I notice you've got me blocked and think I can't read your messages. Whoops, I can.

- No, objectively by definition, removing child porn art doesn't magically somehow mean "omg the devs support child porn"...because they REMOVED it and you're the one advocating for it

Originally posted by Merlin:

Just report this ♥♥♥♥, hes been banned before.

You've been reported for your deliberate mass-false reporting attempt.

Well done proving you have no argument.

Originally posted by Seraphita:

Nobody here is advocating for child porn

Notice how this user has gone from "actually YOU'RE advocating for it" to "OMG NO-ONE IS".

No, if you're actively advocating for the inclusion of child porn art after it has been removed, yes you are.

[AggressiveHibernation]

Originally posted by Merlin:

just report him, the valve moderators will rid us of him like they have before.

Trying to claim i'm banned as you directly reply to me on a thread I made is a pretty special level of cope.

Again, you're reported for knowingly mass-false reporting.

[JEB!]

bad bait

[𝙈𝙚𝙜𝙖𝙡𝙤]

Originally posted by AggressiveHibernation:

Originally posted by 𝙈𝙖𝙞𝙠𝙪:

i havent said anything about advocating child pron.

I notice you've got me blocked and think I can't read your messages. Whoops, I can.

- No, objectively by definition, removing child porn art doesn't magically somehow mean "omg the devs support child porn"...because they REMOVED it and you're the one advocating for it

Originally posted by Merlin:

Just report this ♥♥♥♥, hes been banned before.

You've been reported for your deliberate mass-false reporting attempt.

Well done proving you have no argument.

Originally posted by Seraphita:

Nobody here is advocating for child porn

Notice how this user has gone from "actually YOU'RE advocating for it" to "OMG NO-ONE IS".

No, if you're actively advocating for the inclusion of child porn art after it has been removed, yes you are.

I don't have you blocked. Your statement still doesn't answer my first assessment

[AggressiveHibernation]

Originally posted by JEB!:

bad bait

Yeah, you guys tried this deflection before. It doesn't work when the devs literally removed it and you're all raging to put it back in.

[Defturret]

Originally posted by AggressiveHibernation:

Originally posted by Seraphita:

Usually people accusing others of being pedos are projecting so take it as you wish...

Every right-wing attack is a projection.

Somehow being anit-child porn art, while they actively advocate for it, means i'm "projecting" and want child porn art in the game. Incredible.

Sorry, you guys already tried and failed that fallacy.

sounds like you are projecting lmao

[AggressiveHibernation]

Originally posted by Seraphita:

I don't have you blocked.

He says with me blocked.

- No, objectively by definition, removing child porn art doesn't magically somehow mean "omg the devs support child porn"...because they REMOVED it and you're the one advocating for it

[C H A I R M A N]

the pcsx2 of trolls

[𝙈𝙚𝙜𝙖𝙡𝙤]

you haven't addressed anything I've said.