So, did they remove SonicFox?

[Allard]

Because that one shouldn't have been added in the first place.

[Oku]

"Why didn't they remove the cameo tribute to the world champion for the game who has done more for the game than any other single non-dev individual instead of the panty shot of an underage character that shouldnt have been there to begin with?"

(Jester awards mean you agree with me and that the devs did nothing wrong)

[Allard]

Originally posted by Oku:

(Jester awards mean you agree with me and that the devs did nothing wrong)

You keep telling yourself that.

[cyxceven]

Originally posted by Oku:

(Jester awards mean you agree with me and that the devs did nothing wrong)

Keep reaching for those clowns, ya clown.

[Oku]

Originally posted by Allard:

Originally posted by Oku:

(Jester awards mean you agree with me and that the devs did nothing wrong)

You keep telling yourself that.

I don't have to, y'all keep giving them to me even though you know it means you agree with me. So clearly you agree with me.

[cyxceven]

I gave you zero clowns. But feel free to take this reply. Enjoy.

[Chrono]

Originally posted by Oku:

"Why didn't they remove the cameo tribute to the world champion for the game who has done more for the game than any other single non-dev individual instead of the panty shot of an underage character that shouldnt have been there to begin with?"

(Jester awards mean you agree with me and that the devs did nothing wrong)

The game was designed for people who want to look at beautifully animated sexy girls. Their whole Skullgirls business is run on sexy girls. The risque art was part of its charm and selling point. Their customers feel betrayed over the censorship. They should take the engine and create a new game that doesn't have boobs and butts in it so that it doesn't offend their sensibilities. The game clearly clashes with their values.

They should have finished up Skullgirls DLC and then did something new that didn't have sexy girls. They should have left the content of Skullgirls alone. I imagine they may have a Humble Bundle on the cheap to counteract the bad publicity with new customers. They have been riding on Skullgirls' pervy coattails when they should have spent their time making something new. They are a talented bunch and I'm sure they could create something with appeal that doesn't rely on sex appeal.

If it was me I'd reverse the patch and create a new game with anthropomorphic characters or whatever they want. They don't want T&A nor do they need it but people bought it with Skullgirls. The T&A was a selling point for many of us. It would be like getting a romance novel and the stuff the ladies like is posthumorously removed. Turn "50 Shades of Grey" into "50 Shades of Platonic Love," where the guy is short, poor, scrawny, safe, cowardly, and boring.

[Oku]

Originally posted by Chrono:

Originally posted by Oku:

"Why didn't they remove the cameo tribute to the world champion for the game who has done more for the game than any other single non-dev individual instead of the panty shot of an underage character that shouldnt have been there to begin with?"

(Jester awards mean you agree with me and that the devs did nothing wrong)

The game was designed for people who want to look at beautifully animated sexy girls. Their whole Skullgirls business is run on sexy girls. The risque art was part of its charm and selling point. Their customers feel betrayed over the censorship. They should take the engine and create a new game that doesn't have boobs and butts in it so that it doesn't offend their sensibilities. The game clearly clashes with their values.

They should have finished up Skullgirls DLC and then did something new that didn't have sexy girls. They should have left the content of Skullgirls alone. I imagine they may have a Humble Bundle on the cheap to counteract the bad publicity with new customers. They have been riding on Skullgirls' pervy coattails when they should have spent their time making something new. They are a talented bunch and I'm sure they could create something with appeal that doesn't rely on sex appeal.

If it was me I'd reverse the patch and create a new game with anthropomorphic characters or whatever they want. They don't want T&A nor do they need it but people bought it with Skullgirls. The T&A was a selling point for many of us. It would be like getting a romance novel and the stuff the ladies like is posthumorously removed. Turn "50 Shades of Grey" into "50 Shades of Platonic Love," where the guy is short, poor, scrawny, safe, cowardly, and boring.

My dude a character's skirt was made an inch longer.

[generał lepper]

As if SonicFox has any reason to go back to playing Skullgirls now that they removed loli tits and panties

[Oku]

Originally posted by generał lepper:

As if SonicFox has any reason to go back to playing Skullgirls now that they removed loli tits and panties

Were you one of the pedoweebs that had to delete their twitter profile because you tried to call Sonic a slur and then he pointed out your likes were nothing but CP? Because those are the only people who try to spread the rumor he's in to loli lol

[Luna ~]

Originally posted by generał lepper:

As if SonicFox has any reason to go back to playing Skullgirls now that they removed loli tits and panties

he was literally playing 3 hours ago.

[Vash]

Originally posted by Oku:

Originally posted by Chrono:

The game was designed for people who want to look at beautifully animated sexy girls. Their whole Skullgirls business is run on sexy girls. The risque art was part of its charm and selling point. Their customers feel betrayed over the censorship. They should take the engine and create a new game that doesn't have boobs and butts in it so that it doesn't offend their sensibilities. The game clearly clashes with their values.

They should have finished up Skullgirls DLC and then did something new that didn't have sexy girls. They should have left the content of Skullgirls alone. I imagine they may have a Humble Bundle on the cheap to counteract the bad publicity with new customers. They have been riding on Skullgirls' pervy coattails when they should have spent their time making something new. They are a talented bunch and I'm sure they could create something with appeal that doesn't rely on sex appeal.

If it was me I'd reverse the patch and create a new game with anthropomorphic characters or whatever they want. They don't want T&A nor do they need it but people bought it with Skullgirls. The T&A was a selling point for many of us. It would be like getting a romance novel and the stuff the ladies like is posthumorously removed. Turn "50 Shades of Grey" into "50 Shades of Platonic Love," where the guy is short, poor, scrawny, safe, cowardly, and boring.

My dude a character's skirt was made an inch longer.

My guy, they changed character's stories and removed the Soviet announcer which was a Kickstarter goal. Stop using strawmans for a moment and read the patch notes.
Personally, I don't care about the sexual content, I think the artwork and character design is both charming and appealing enough without relying on that. The problem is the principle, along with the fact that they went above and beyond to remove actual content.

[Oku]

Originally posted by Vash:

Originally posted by Oku:

My dude a character's skirt was made an inch longer.

My guy, they changed character's stories and removed the Soviet announcer which was a Kickstarter goal. Stop using strawmans for a moment and read the patch notes.
Personally, I don't care about the sexual content, I think the artwork and character design is both charming and appealing enough without relying on that. The problem is the principle, along with the fact that they went above and beyond to remove actual content.

"the problem is the principle" is the phrase spoken by somebody that has no actual justified reason to be upset and needs to gesture vaguely at devs making changes they don't like but ultimately do not affect them in any way shape or form. The only thing more meaningless is cries of "censorship".

[Vash]

Originally posted by Oku:

Originally posted by Vash:

My guy, they changed character's stories and removed the Soviet announcer which was a Kickstarter goal. Stop using strawmans for a moment and read the patch notes.
Personally, I don't care about the sexual content, I think the artwork and character design is both charming and appealing enough without relying on that. The problem is the principle, along with the fact that they went above and beyond to remove actual content.

"the problem is the principle" is the phrase spoken by somebody that has no actual justified reason to be upset and needs to gesture vaguely at devs making changes they don't like but ultimately do not affect them in any way shape or form. The only thing more meaningless is cries of "censorship".

How it doesn't affect me? I paid for the game, I paid for its content, twice in fact. I liked the background of characters like Big Band, I also liked to hear the Soviet commenting while I play, and even liked to fight characters related to the Black Egrets because they were meant to resemble bad people that deserve to be punched. Now years later and that's all gone, along with the documented history of the game's development that was presented in the art compendium. 'Revision' is the most fitting name they could've chosen for this.

The principle that I meant is that they shouldn't cut out content or alter the original vision years later. Again, I don't really care about the sexual stuff, I'm talking about things like the voice pack, the background stories, the artwork etc. They even removed guest art that was present in the game; if I was the artist, I'd be very upset.

[Angry Mob Justice]

Originally posted by Oku:

"the problem is the principle" is the phrase spoken by somebody that has no actual justified reason to be upset and needs to gesture vaguely at devs making changes they don't like but ultimately do not affect them in any way shape or form. The only thing more meaningless is cries of "censorship".

Why are you dodging the point about altering the character story and removing kickstarter goals?

[Allard]

Originally posted by Oku:

I don't have to, y'all keep giving them to me even though you know it means you agree with me. So clearly you agree with me.

You don't have to and yet you keep doing that. Yup, sounds believable.