Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Obviously, something jostled loose in there, dunno what. But the origional question still seems valid. Just how much can a rotor take before just being unable to move?
There you go :D
It depends on a few factors: One factor is the forces acting on the object the rotor is supposed to be rotating. For example, are there thrusters on the sides of the object that would resist rate of change of displacement? Or is the object affected by gravity in a way that could resist torque from the rotor?
A second factor would be where the force is acting upon the object. Think of the 'torque' of the rotor as the 'moment' it inflicts on the object. If the other force acting on the object creates a moment equal to the torque that the rotor can provide, then you have reached the motor's limit. For example, a force acting on the end of a beam will produce a higher moment than a force acting near the center of rotation. To help you out with this, here is a handy equation:
T = Fx, where T = Torque caused by a force, F = Force on the object and x = distance of Force from center of rotation.
The first two factors are examples of more simple physics and a very quick number crunch can work those two problems out.
The third factor is noticeably more complex. It firstly depends on the tolerance on a design. What I mean by this is what the engineer deems an acceptable movement, for example, a design that takes 3 minutes to rotate an object at maximum speed might be deemed acceptable, yet a design that takes 3 years to rotate an object at maximum spee might not be. In both cases, the object is capable of moving, but the second moves so slowly it can be considered as 'unable to move'.
Again, the torque comes into this problem. However, the acceptability of the design depends on a variable called 'angular acceleration'. In laymans terms, this is the rate of increase of rotationary speed. This variable is in turn dependant on two other variables, the Torque on the object and the objects 'Moment of Inertia'. To further relaborate, 'Moment of Inertia' is not the same thing as 'Torque'. In simple terms, the 'Moment of Inertia' of an object is the objects 'resistance' to angular movement. The equation relating Torque of angular acceleration is:
T = I*alpha, where T = Torque, I = Moment of Inertia and alpha = angular acceleration.
Torque is easy to figure out. The complexity in this third factor lies in calculating the Moment of Inertia. This can be mathematically calculated by integration, however this only proves useful for simple shapes, where calculations are relatively simple. More complex shapes, although can be worked out mathematically, can take large amounts of time, and are better off measured experimentally.
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=261675846
Note that the one and only thing that should be affecting the main arm is the rotor it's attached to. It does have a Gravity Generator at each end, but they are only there to affect the mass blocks attached to the sled, thus pulling it forward every half rotation. There's nothing else out there for those Grav Gens to act upon. So unless Grav Gens can suddenly pull laterally, I don't see how they could affect anything.
And of course there's no Gyroscopes or Thrusters on the mining arm. It's supposed to rotate, those would kill any rotation that would happen.