Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Going with the KISS principle, I'll have enough trouble classfiying size alone even with a standard metric to go by, prefixes and suffixs like Heavy and Escort further complicating things.
What Naval Tradition are we going to hold to?
Because a Frigate of the Modern (US) Navy is one size, whereas a Frigate of the Spanish Main was quite entirely another...
And then to point out that a modern (US) Destroyer and Cruiser Share a similar Hull, where only the outfitting and superstructure differ...
(No one ever said Naval Traditions hold any logic)
Red ship is not well armed or armoured enough to be called a destroyer and too slow to be a frigate.
Though of course trying to apply terrestrial naval terms to spacecraft really dosen't work anyway.
Shipclasses in the current navy and historically never have been very clear on exact size either but is seems mostly based on intended role, where size comes secondary as those have changed over time and even between current day navies around the world.
Per a classification I've come up with it's a frigate - light ship-of-the-line with requisite autonomy features, therefore significatnly larger than the similarily armed destroyer.
Unless it has some bigger guns (either mods or mass cannons), I'd call it an armed transport.