Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Could you give us the mathematical power requirement..?
a) if not then your claim falls apart
b) if you can then we can check it and see if it would be even possible to have one inside the scope of Space Engineers
Which is really too bad, because I'd love be able to:
1) Turn on meteors.
2) Have solar power panels up.
3) Be able to defend them from meteors with turrets that I didn't have to stop and reload every thirty seconds.
"Force fields" have already been discovered. The problem is that it doesn't just shield one way, but two way.
Here's a video about it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHFZFiSvNk0&list=UUhqgQknjcmAsjosqac1uLqA
Yeah, it's possible to add this to the game (if you add the side effects)
Your mind = blown
So, theoretical. They don't have a working prototype yet, and as such it might not be possible (or at least usefull) in 60 years as they haven't been able to test how practical it would be in real life.
Because the entire pricipal of the game is about armour collisions and such. Adding in an energy shield of some kind would make that initial pricipal pointless. Either way Dev's already stated. that is won't happen. So, unless some taleted modders decides to make one you're out of luck.
As for the bullets in space - Newtons 1st law - an object in motion stays in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force. Guns use an explosive charge to provide the initial acceleration. In space there are few if any forces acting to slow down a bullet so, once fired the bullet wouldn't stop till it hit something.
A few missiles cutting ships in half? My ships can have 10 missile turrets fire att them when they're flying at 4 m/s for 1600m. They're not even that big, just designed with the center of mass in mind to distract the missiles.
your ships sound invincible and awesome and i wish i had that sort of skill... on a less sarcastic note: i didnt mean LITERALLY cut in half so much as pretty damn wrecked. with MP still pretty unplayable (at least for me anyway) its hard to test what a real battle would look like with limited ammo and whatnot, but any meaningful engagement is likely to leave all ships involved in a nearly unrepairable state if not completely destroyed. my military ships can take a lot of punishment but their state afterwards is pretty nearly unrepairable. and you can just forget about using light armor on anything that may be shot at, those will certainly be cut in half... this i have tested, and had no trouble splitting them literally in 2. btw 4 m/s is god aweful slow to be testing at, i typically test at somewhere between 30-60 m/s if not even faster, seeing as how matching speed seems like something that would have to happen to engage a target. missiles are certainly interesting at that kind of speed :D
please do post something on the workshop for me to check out, perhaps i have been doing it all wrong and i can just eat crow and get on with it
On many occassions artificial gravity had been generated. Primarily in regards to centripetal force and linear acceleration. Aside from these more accepted methods of generating artificial gravity, there is also magnetism which has been used to levitate mice by creating a 1g field that negated earths gravity(effects on human was unclear and required avoidance of ferromagnetic or paramagnetic materials). There is also Gravitomagnetism which is proposed primarily in science fiction, but claims have been made of it's validity by Eugene Podkletnov, a Russian engineer in 1990 and in 2006, a research group funded by ESA. String theory assumes this is quite possible.
Even in today's generation, we use gravity for training purposes such as centrifuge(High-G training), Parabolic flight, and neutral bouyancy. Gemeni 11 is a space mission that had created artificial gravity for a few minutes having to stop the experiment as it got to much for the crew.
There have been many space ship proposals that incorporate artificial gravity into their design, such as Discovery 2, Multi-Mission Space Exploration Vehicle (MMSEV), ISS Centrifuge Demo, Mars Direct, Tempo 3, and the Mars Gravity Biosatellite.
With all this evidence supporting artificial gravity, please explain why you think it would be "magic" in 60-70 years? XD