Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Also they don't explode as ferociously as big one and losing couple means you still have back-ups.
Because its a cosmetic, not everyone does hardcore PvP, some people build things that look cool.
Massive? Not really. You can fit it in pretty compact ships, you have example in Surviving in Space scenario, where eventually you're being led to one.
Well, game isn't going to 180 its direction or mechanics with random cosmetic DLC in the future, this much I can tell you.
You want to play Empyrion.
Why would I want a lower capacity? I'd like to fly the ship for more than 5 minutes without having to refuel.
I'm not doing hardcore pvp either and I don't think it looks cool which is exactly my problem. It ceases to be cosmetic the moment the size changes because with that the limitations are increased. The thruster looks way better than the old one but at price of a stricter limitation. If you want the cool looking one it sticks out half a mile to make sure everyone can hit it with their eyes closed...
It's 18 blocks of space and it's a huge square with no connection ports, it's a huge brick that you have to work around..come on now.
Not asking for a 180, I'm asking for more compact blocks so we can build better looking ships. I'm not expecting anything for free either, I own every DLC. Better looking ships on Youtube draws in new players btw, new players is more cash.
Maybe I'll check it out, thanks.
Yeah I tried to get some large thrusters pointing downward on my fighter, I gave that up real quick. Between all the space that takes and those tanks I'll end up with another monster in no time. So instead I had to spam like 20 small ones which not only kills the look but makes it a real challenge using hydrogen thrusters trying to connect them all and still keep a compact look.
I didn't want to do a hybrid because I'm always carrying around a ton of weight that isn't being used like ion on planets or atmo in space. Not to mention if you are making a fighter where are you going to fit all those thrusters? Frustrating.
If going for an all hydrogen build the large tanks are typically better, but the smaller tanks have use too, just a matter of how inventive you are, like hydrogen tank missiles.
And told the community to create new Portal "Petitions" so they can choose from the most wanted to add in the next game update so I recommned to go create a new Portal Feedback to have a chance they select yours for the next update.
Use the Portal search tool first because more than a lot are partitcipating.
Support Portal = https://support.keenswh.com/spaceengineers/pc
(create "Bug report" or "Request help"(Private) or "Feedback"(Petition) on the Portal)
- Important to know on Portal Feedback (suggestion) :
1 - Feedbacks must have only one idea in for the vote system to work properly, more than one idea to vote on will become unusable.
2 - A good title that shows what is in to vote on will give it a better visibility to have more votes.
You don't need a tank at all to fill your jetpack bottles. All you need is an o2/h2 generator and some ice lol.
Good point, I suppose they do have their uses in some odd situations, I still think they are too heavy though for what they are.
I like them, don't get me wrong, in fact that is exactly what I am asking for but the weight and how many you need compared to a large on makes their use limited. I like the block, I just think they need balancing.
= useless for me too, well I only used it one time and noticed it was useless on Atmos ship.
I did not tried with Hydro thrusters because it seemed not a good move and why I tried with the Hydro Engine.
imo = not a good move to use the small Hydro tank for a Hydro thruster ship.
Yeah I agree after comparing the weight, 5 times the weight of a large one is way too much to make it worth it. To compensate I'll need more thrusters which in return will burn more hydrogen. It literally isn't worth it by a long shot.
But for ship thrusters = No go.
You're such a fun killer.... ;-)))
But of course you are right, you don't _need_ the tank for this. But i had a few blocks left empty on my little rover, so i had to find some use to fill the empty space... et voila: The Tank (with a tank inside). :-D
As mentioned above, being able to distribute your hydrogen around might be helpful in dangerous situation.