Space Engineers

Space Engineers

View Stats:
Laffyistired Nov 22, 2017 @ 12:20am
Mining on Moon Problem with vanilla ships
hi guys using vanilla ships to mine on the moon with iron engines they not working what is going on before when was playing no problem need help please and advice i am in sp the moon is 0.25 gravity
< >
Showing 1-15 of 17 comments
eMYNOCK Nov 22, 2017 @ 1:29am 
can you show the affected ship and outfit?

probably your miner is either full, too heavy, has not enough engines or a mixture of all.
Laffyistired Nov 22, 2017 @ 1:34am 
its the miner is the easy start platform
eMYNOCK Nov 22, 2017 @ 1:43am 
the blue miner i guess?

this ship has indeed not enough thrusters to handle 0.25g.

how ever.. you can add 4-6 more downward thrusters onto it and it should be flyable.
Laffyistired Nov 22, 2017 @ 2:06am 
i added 3 each direction still gave me a problem when i was drilling a hole
eMYNOCK Nov 22, 2017 @ 2:53am 
sorry about that.. but it really seems that either the drill becomes too heavy or the engines are simply too weak.

you should go into creative mode and fiddle a bit with the moons gravity and what you need to make the ship working how you need it.

i can't really help because i don't know what your preffered game mode, your preferred settings and your game style are.
Laffyistired Nov 22, 2017 @ 3:41am 
how was it before they messed up did the moon have 0.25 did the nerf then engines
eMYNOCK Nov 22, 2017 @ 4:02am 
nah.. moon always had 0.25g and afaik they changed nothing with the ion thrusters.

tbh.. i never used the blue miner except for asteroid mining.
Last edited by eMYNOCK; Nov 22, 2017 @ 4:03am
CelticChaos Nov 22, 2017 @ 4:36am 
ion thrusters in gravity are just not the way to go. On a moon the best option is Hydrogen. Atmos, well they require atmosphere and are not an option for a moon but work well on planets with atmosphere.

At about 10 g, ion thrusters become severely impacted from a performance perspective, as you approach 15 g they become almost useless. They may be able to give you a soft moon landing but that is about it. You will not be able to takeoff agalin.
Last edited by CelticChaos; Nov 22, 2017 @ 4:37am
SpetS Nov 22, 2017 @ 4:39am 
more power maybe
Dan2D3D  [developer] Nov 22, 2017 @ 5:29am 
40 small + 2 large ion forward thrusters needed on my heavy armor space tank to be able to exit the moon gravity.

http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1126899475


EDIT

All ion and I've added only 2 upward Hydro thrusters to help on moon.
Last edited by Dan2D3D; Nov 22, 2017 @ 5:38am
Baratheon79 Nov 22, 2017 @ 6:10am 
Originally posted by Silverwing:
ion thrusters in gravity are just not the way to go. ...
Not necessarily true. For a good size miner, you may want hydrogen thrusters, but I recently built a little 2 drill miner that works fine on the moon, even fully loaded at 10x inventory, using only ion thrusters.
AstridK Nov 22, 2017 @ 6:46am 
As far as i know ion engines are impacted by atmosphere adn not gravity.
Neverthe less. My small moon ship here has 2 large ion engines onlw pointing down.
I have no problem with a full cargo load and stilla plently of power up.
Laffyistired Nov 22, 2017 @ 6:49am 
i did use miner with hydrogen thrusters i had 8k of ice and that went in 5 mins any suggestions or is that normal i was using miner off the work shop

also is there ice on the moon ? as in game only
Last edited by Laffyistired; Nov 22, 2017 @ 6:51am
CelticChaos Nov 22, 2017 @ 7:52am 
As suggested you can use ION if you like pasting enormous thrusters on a little miner (just not to my taste), but it can be done, and I stand corrected.

Yes, the burn rate of ice with Hydro is pretty high. I Normally have 100k loaded up before a mining run. There is ice on the moon, but it is concentrated in one area as far as I know. I built my moon base pretty close so getting ice is no big deal.

The moral of my story, do what you want, I find Hydro is my best option to keep the thruster count down and without using large thrusters.
Baratheon79 Nov 22, 2017 @ 4:11pm 
Originally posted by Silverwing:
As suggested you can use ION if you like pasting enormous thrusters on a little miner (just not to my taste), but it can be done, and I stand corrected.

Yes, the burn rate of ice with Hydro is pretty high. I Normally have 100k loaded up before a mining run. There is ice on the moon, but it is concentrated in one area as far as I know. I built my moon base pretty close so getting ice is no big deal.

The moral of my story, do what you want, I find Hydro is my best option to keep the thruster count down and without using large thrusters.
If using a larger mining ship (small or large grid), then yes, hydrogen is probably a good idea. In my survival game, I've got 2 mining ships that work just fine on the moon, which are both currently up on the workshop. The larger of the two has much greater capacity, and requires the extra power of hydrogen thrusters to maneuver on the moon (I often use them in space as well, as I routinely fill the thing to the brim with ore). The smaller one, I designed to fit in the hangar of a specific large ship I built, and the specifications I had to hold myself to did not allow for hydrogen fuel storage (no more than 5 large blocks long, and had to fit through an opening 3 blocks wide and 2 high). That one uses just ion thrusters (including 2 large and a few small pointing downward).

Edit: As an experiment, I loaded up my game in creative mode, pasted in the little KSH miner, and tinkered with it until it could fly on the moon with a load of ore. This was the result (it's not pretty, but it flies, though it can use more reactors)...
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1208469179
Last edited by Baratheon79; Nov 22, 2017 @ 4:46pm
< >
Showing 1-15 of 17 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Nov 22, 2017 @ 12:20am
Posts: 17