Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Why ? More efficient and you CAN'T build 9 smalls together (3x3) because of their ports.
But if you don't have the necessariy space (for example, a looonnnng flat ship), you can still go for smalls ones.
Large Reactor is abolutely overpowered, very heavy and able to power huge walls of ion thrusters or charging several Jump Drives.
For anything else you're hauling dead weight since you won't be using 1% of it's maximum output.
Large becomes worth it when about 20 small reactors aren't enough to power your grid.
In my game, my base ship is powered by two large reactors, but I've got a large number of ion thrusters, as well as 4 refineries, 4 arc furnaces, 4 assemblers and 2 jump drives. I've also got enough batteries to run every system on the ship for a couple of hours on battery power alone (in the unlikely case that I run out of fuel, or something happens to one or both of my reactors). But this ship is basically a mobile base, designed to carry everything I need on board. Something to just get into space would be much more basic, and wouldn't have anywhere near the same power requirements.