Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Assetto Corsa does seem to make use of many threads, with Intel at least.
I was in a similar position not long ago. I had an i7 870 from 2009 which was still doing an excellent job a year ago, first paired, when I got the rig back in 2010 with a GTX 570. I then upgraded it with a GTX 770 and later with a GTX 970 (all MSI gaming editions). Even with the GTX 970, the intel was really doing fine. I had a slight bottleneck with the GTX 770, the GPU wasn't running on it full potential, where the GTX 970 was even more of an overkill, but it still did boost my FPS and I was always able to enjoy latest titles @60FPS on highest settings without issues. The only games the rig had tourble with, were the ones which were taxing the CPU a lot, like AC with a full grid of AI. This was actually also the reason I decided to go for a full upgrade and got myself an i7 6700 paired with a 1080 and with DDR4 Rams. On the old machine, AC was running fine, on almost highest settings @full HD, but there was some stutter at 32 slot norde servers in pits and also with the AI, which was driving me nuts. I'm sure I'll be able to upgrade the graphics card once or twice on my new rig every 2 years till it will need a complete replacement, since there arent a lot of games which heavily need your CPU and all of its threads, which kinda is a shame ...
My two cents, dont upgrade now, wait it out, use it as far as possible and then ditch the whole thing and get a new one with a future. Banging money into this @this stage would be like throwing your money out of the window. We're not rich enough to afford cheap stuff, you ever heard that? ;)
Yeah I know what you mean :) And because of that, I am considering that ryzen 5 1600. I am thinking that it will improve my game performance instantly (even with my old gpu for now) and it will be good cpu for many years to come. So I can easily upgrade gpu later. Or am I wrong and is really better to wait and buy whole new computer later?
So dunno which way you'd like to go, but as far as I am concerned, as I also have done so, I'd rather save up some more and upgrade everything @ one time. It all depends you know, and you're the one knowing whats the best for you, so your call ;) One way or the other, best of luck with whichever way you decide to go.
if im not mistaken your current cpu is FM3 socket, which means the 'socket' on your motherboard can fit cpus that are FM3 socket.
intel are completely different and unfortunatly the ryzen you are looking at is AM4 socket, totally different again.
so as far as i can see you got 2 choices, you can find a faster FM3 socket cpu and hope its enough (it should be if you buy the right one)
OR
you can buy a new motherboard with the correct socket for the cpu you fancy the most.
but i will just add (cos it sounds like you are unsure) you dont have any similar restrictions with gpus, just about any gpu will fit any mobo.
so the point to my ramblings is yes if you dont upgrade your cpu in some way your AC will struggle.
unfortunatly i cant give an informmed opinion on what cpu to buy cos i havent done enough reading about the new AMD jobbies but i will just say i have been building my own and friends pc for a long time now and ive always gone AMD/ATI and always had the (slightly) slower pc to similar intel/nvidia builds that ive done (much to my disgust). i wont ever have an AMD/ATI build for myself again. all intel and nvidia for me from now on. at the end of the day intel cost more and you get what you pay for in this world, no matter what bumf AMD spout about their latest offering and its been like that for years with these 2 companies. take that however you will, just my 2 pennies worth.
good luck
http://www.corsair.com/en-gb/hydro-series-h100-extreme-performance-liquid-cpu-cooler
thats what i got, bit of case modding to get it fitted and you could make your current cpu sing.
My Ryzen is running at 3.6ghz, my i5 was running at 3.8ghz.
The Ryzen runs about 20 degrees cooler, just on the bog standard wraithspire cooler.
It's running assetto wonderfully well in vr, first impressions is it's running it better than my old i5.
I upgraded to amd, rather than intel, mainly for the price.
Intel are, basically, robbing b'stards and for the price the Ryzen 5 was a no brainer.
I do quite a bit of photography editing and the Ryzen is miles better where that's concerned.
If I were you I'd go for the Ryzen 5 now BUT you will need a new board and you will need DDR4 ram and Windows 10!
That however was about 2 years ago, with some major overhauls to the sim-engine in-between. So chances are, your cpu is even less of a hindrance than it would have been 2 years ago.
I am guessing, you'd see far more return on investment simply by getting a faster and more efficient graphics-card - although: chances are the visual upgrades won't be that much of a step up, talking specifically about this game here.
In my case I could not get a solid 60fps out of my HD5770 no matter what I tried in the settings. No matter the cpu, the performance was perceivably identical. Only the r9 390 I put in afterwards changed the situation. People freak out too much over cpu-performance with this sim. While it might be factually true that other games tax the cpu far, far less, I reckon the truth - as always - to be found between the lines.