Try running 1920x1080 Res Scale 200%

[Quick☢420™]

It looks super sharp on my machine,better than 4k,it a weird game,full of odd bugs,but a lot of fun to play.

[Brad]

Yeah Just tried 150% resolution scale at 1440p and it looks really really good. It looked like crap at 125% though. basically anything but 150 or 200 didn't look good. DLAA looks pretty good but 150% resolution scale really just cleans everything up. Too bad I can only run it at 30fps...

Games untouchable in terms of graphics if you have it fully cranked up with resolution scale pushed up as well. Horrizon isn't even close and there is nothing else available with these reflections.

[RuntWolfApologist]

200% at 4k is fine for me

[MysticalPotato]

Originally posted by Brad:

Games untouchable in terms of graphics if you have it fully cranked up with resolution scale pushed up as well. Horrizon isn't even close and there is nothing else available with these reflections.

Untouchable? You're seeing things, or just plain delusional

[Khodeus™]

Problem with lower res than 4k for me it's flashing screen borders.

[that wasn't "Cash Money" of you]

Originally posted by Brad:

Yeah Just tried 150% resolution scale at 1440p and it looks really really good. It looked like crap at 125% though. basically anything but 150 or 200 didn't look good. DLAA looks pretty good but 150% resolution scale really just cleans everything up. Too bad I can only run it at 30fps...

Games untouchable in terms of graphics if you have it fully cranked up with resolution scale pushed up as well. Horrizon isn't even close and there is nothing else available with these reflections.

You realize those "reflections" are mostly generic cookie cutter screen space reflections. There is very minimal ray tracing in this game and the resolution is very low.

[Quick☢420™]

Yeah I found that running 1920x1080 full settings (including full rt) with 200% scale makes it look really good and performance is better than running standard 4k at full settings (including full rt) With 4k my gpu a 3090 is pegged at 100% full grid race and with 1920x1080/200% it's at 85% full grid race.

[Voodoochile]

Originally posted by Quick☢420™:

Yeah I found that running 1920x1080 full settings (including full rt) with 200% scale makes it look really good and performance is better than running standard 4k at full settings (including full rt) With 4k my gpu a 3090 is pegged at 100% full grid race and with 1920x1080/200% it's at 85% full grid race.

But you are on 4K screen, right? You mean 1080p at 200% scaling looks&works better on 4K display than native 4K. Interesting if so. I will have to test this but I play on 2K and when I chose the 1080p the game just spazes out with blinking lines on the side.

Another Q: Why not use 2K instead of 200% of 1080p. Shouldn't it look better since it's native 2k?

[XX_Swaglord420_XX]

I tried but honestly still super vague and blurry most of the time.

[Firmamento]

Yeah looks amazing at 150-200%. Even 130 was a huge step up from 100%.

Not too sure about the DF claim that ultra setting runs the game at 4k even if resolution setting is lower. I’m at 1440p, on Ultra which means the game is rendering at 4K according to them, but I’m also doing the 200% and still getting locked 60fps on a 6950XT so that means game is rendering at 8k? I don’t think so. Doesn’t seem to even be a difference in performance for me between high and ultra.

Such a stupid way to have the options lol, took years and this is how they set it up.

[MysticalPotato]

Originally posted by Quick☢420™:

It looks super sharp on my machine,better than 4k,it a weird game,full of odd bugs,but a lot of fun to play.

No

[[STG] Dante]

150% at 1440p actually looks like what it should.

[andressergio]

Originally posted by Brad:

Yeah Just tried 150% resolution scale at 1440p and it looks really really good. It looked like crap at 125% though. basically anything but 150 or 200 didn't look good. DLAA looks pretty good but 150% resolution scale really just cleans everything up. Too bad I can only run it at 30fps...

Games untouchable in terms of graphics if you have it fully cranked up with resolution scale pushed up as well. Horrizon isn't even close and there is nothing else available with these reflections.

i tested it and reported on other thread that are doing the same, i use DLAA, so when i put 150% it puts DLAA OFF, when you set DLAA ON again (or DLSS) it puts Resolution Scale at AUTO, so infinite loop i can't make it work above 100%

[Voodoochile]

Guys, please, before you tank half of your FPS, use sharpen from your GPU driver.
Using resolution scaling is almost never worth it. The game looks poor because of the muddy TAA and the motion blur + Lense flare.

If you want to make it look more high res:
- Use native resolution
- Max sharpen from driver
- Remove Motion Blur
- Remove Lense Flare

Run Benchmark and check if you are reaching desired FPS & you are CPU limited.
If that's the case then you have more headroom with your GPU -> Then you can try using more than 100% resolution scaling.

[andressergio]

Originally posted by Firmamento:

Yeah looks amazing at 150-200%. Even 130 was a huge step up from 100%.

Not too sure about the DF claim that ultra setting runs the game at 4k even if resolution setting is lower. I’m at 1440p, on Ultra which means the game is rendering at 4K according to them, but I’m also doing the 200% and still getting locked 60fps on a 6950XT so that means game is rendering at 8k? I don’t think so. Doesn’t seem to even be a difference in performance for me between high and ultra.

Such a stupid way to have the options lol, took years and this is how they set it up.

my monitor is 3840x1600 and when i put 125% or 150% it puts my DLAA OFF (or DLSS OFF) , so when i go on and turn on again it puts Resolution Scale on AUTO....and i'm in that loop, it only allows me to stay DLAA + 100%