Triple buffering?

[Purge]

Will they help with the FPS?

[oat child]

yes

I actually have no clue

[Purge]

In Ac4 it helped so I'm thinking it could help keep the FPS a bit more consistant here too. Any confirmation?

[Psychic]

The game seems to have triple buffering included, not like AC4.
At least, when the fps go down (which happens a lot), the fps don't lock at 30 like on AC4.

[Trevor Philips]

No,there is not tripple Buffering

[quf]

Publicado originalmente por aidenman:

No,there is not tripple Buffering

Yes there is, you have the option of V-sync off, 1 frame (double buffer), and 2 frame (triple buffer).

[Psychic]

Publicado originalmente por Quffy:

Publicado originalmente por aidenman:

No,there is not tripple Buffering

Yes there is, you have the option of V-sync off, 1 frame (double buffer), and 2 frame (triple buffer).

2 frame is not equal to triple buffer, it will lock your fps to 30.
But v-sync (1 frame) seems to have triple buffering.

[D2KX]

Vsync off = fastest
Vsync on (double buffering) = no tearing, slower, FPS cap
Vsync on (triple buffering) = no tearing, good performance, but needs a lot of VRAM

[DragonSlayer]

Only works with V-Sync on. Basically it has your system pre-render the frames so your PC is processing data ahead of what you see on screen.

The advantage is that it can help make the game smoother if your PC can not process the data in real time & helps reduce input lag that V-Sync can cause.
The disadvantage is that you use more VRAM as you are storing rendered frames ready to be shipped out to your monitor.

End of the day if your struggling to meet FPS expectations, I.E 60fps. Turn off V-Sync (as you wont see any screen tearing if FPS is below your refresh rate) and with that double and triple buffering becomes meaningless anyway.