Instalar o Steam
Iniciar sessão
|
Idioma
简体中文 (Chinês Simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês Tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol de Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol da América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Brasil)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar problema de tradução
O developer deste produto marcou um post como resposta ao tópico acima.
Regras e Orientações das Discussões
Denunciar este post
exploring this more while making the box even larger:
so imagine some future "french" mixed squad to have a number of different nationalities. let's also for the sake of argument say that the Czech Legion is only available at co-op levels 71-80. as i mentioned, one can play the Czech all the time in private matches if set at those levels, but what about public games? what if radek wants to play Czech Legion with friends in a public match and they find themselves at co-op level 100?
i wonder if "prestige" can include an optional reward for public matches restricted to level 100 co-op teams. in addition to the team vote given to all teams at all levels for changing squad types (staying at their existing level), why not allow the most experienced and dedicated teams a vote to play at a voluntarily lower level of their choosing in a public match?
Example One: radek and friends have often played Verdun and find themselves at co-op level 100, but they want to play as Czech Legion at level 71 to 80. why not reward his experienced team with "prestige" the choice to voluntarily play public matches at that lower level they can vote upon? radek and his pals would still be required to reach co-op level 100 in order to be given this reward of voluntarily lowering their squad level.
Example Two: biggalloot has played with hundreds and more likely thousands of verduners and only rarely now has a chance to play any public game at co-op level 1. If biggalloot ever plays as Poilus or Belgians in a public match he is unlikely to get a chance to play with the red pants of the Poilus or the top hats of the Belgians since both are only found at co-op level 1. why not allow biggalloot if he ever plays as co-op level 100 with some friends the choice to voluntarily have a vote within his team to play that public game at a lower level of their choosing and once again play a public match with red pants or a top hat?
Example Three: developer leo wants to play a public game with the other developers as a team but they do wish to be modest and do not want to be the only team with level 100 creeping barrage. allow his level 100 team a vote to play at a lower level if they so wish.
the vote for lower squad quality given as a benefit for level 100 co-op teams should be only available in public matches. for example, someone wishing to set up and host a private game with all teams at level 1 should not have a few teams breaking that template through team vote.
Footnote:
I did not mean this as off-topic. I am still exploring what a mixed "french" or "british" squad might include.
alternative hints are found at the 1914-18 Series Facebook page. Facebook page has a coded message and an unique-looking squad type action picture.
Indochinese squad would be another good one. They are physically distinct (tier one could have the conical hats and later squads would have adrian helmets) and have a very unique rifle. (almost like a longer carbine).
first, the troops from what was then French West Africa came from Senegal, Mali, Guinea, Benin, Burkina Faso, Ivory Coast, and Niger. they were all called Senegalese for convenience.
147,000 total deaths in WW1 by troops from Canada, Australia, and New Zealand COMBINED.
167,000 total deaths in WW1 by those nations i previously mentioned from French West Africa COMBINED according to an estimate made by a Russian source found at Wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_I_casualties
regardless of the true numbers, the "Senegalese" served with honor and distinction and suffered greatly for France.
if that russian estimate of 167+K killed serving France during WW1 from French West Africa is even close to being correct, the "Senegalese" should be a very worthy addition to the Verdun Series.
that Wiki link otherwise mentions:
26K killed from Algeria serving France.
12K killed from Indochina serving France.
8K killed from Morocco serving France.
2K killed from Tunisia serving France.
even people like me who have made an effort to study the history of The Great War has to be surprised by the support given France given by those brave men from French West Africa.
These are very interesting stastics! I've been studying the colonial empires during this era and its amazing to see the scale of it.
Personally, this game needs more Central Power representation.
The long standing issue is still the same, the Central powers lack new equipment to add for a new squad.
Maybe if the game would be expanded to Verdun & Isonzo then we should have the long awaited Italians and Austro-Hungarians with the already existing German squads and Entente squads helping in, as historically they have been sent to the Italian front as reinforcment. Maybe limit them to one original "Verdun" squad per battle. I think the Italian front would fit in with Verdun as it is pretty much the (South)-Western front and too small to have it's own game as of my point of view.
the western front was overwhelmingly a german-only affair so there will inherently be fewer CP squads than entente, who conversely were very diverse. instead of pointing out how many entente squads there are compared to CP squads, you should be happy that the entente right now has more than five squad options.
i once proposed to have certain entente nations locked to certain sectors/maps, so you would never see say belgians outside of flanders and no commonwealth in vosges and so on, which could also be interesting gameplay wise. and now with the addition of an additional french squad, this option is gettign more realistic as the commonwealth and french by themselves get closer to the number of german squads.