安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Even though I had an A1200, I owned the OCS version - can't remember why now, maybe it was cheaper, or maybe the AGA version came out later?
Anyway, I even at the time thought the colours were a bit off on the AGA; obviously they wanted to show off the extra colours but took it too far-- kind of like how they over-use any new graphical effect these days, remember the horrible drenched-in-bloom effect of a a couple of years back?
Indeed. It's just a modern monitor will 'show up' the pixelation and other flaws so much more than an old blurry CRT monitor or TV, which add things like free aliasing; converseley though the blacks might have been deeper.
I would venture it's also a case of not quite remembering how it actually looked, especially as at the time the graphics were actually pretty damn good.
It's a shame there still doesn't seem to be any really convincing 'old video cables simulation mode', I actually can't remember how I connected my Amiga to the TV now... I don't recall having the three video cables but I suppose it must've been for the audio as well.
Hard to imagine having to put up with the crappy RF signal. Fuzzy and bleeding colours all round; still, I suppose it has a kind of charm.
Aye. But I always find it odd that without the advantage of comparison with modern tech, such glaringly obvious image quality shortcomings weren't really obviious.
I suppose it's the same effect as how cutting edge graphics at whatever time will always be impressive - and it's even difficult to remember thinking that way. I suppose, especially back in C64 days for example, I didn't really hold up realism as the standard for graphics-- rather just well drawn art.
It could be said even that considering how limited they were, it was pretty damn impressive wit some of the stuff they came up with; audio wise also-- Rob Hubbard's music springs to mind (anyone remember a title called Crazy Comets/Mega Apocalypse?); and the fantastic Theme Park from Last Ninja 2.
It'd be such a nostalgia fest to get an old small CRT and an Amiga and C64.
However I played all my Amiga games on an official Commodore and a NEC CRT monitor. So no color bleeding/fuzziness there, however scanlines can do magic to low resolutions.
The PC version is 100%, completely, IDENTICAL, down to the last pixel, to the Amiga AGA version. (Of course, like most people, I prefer the ECS version -- but the guys who made this version didn't do their homework.)
This isn't an opinion. It's like saying "Oh, in my opinion that cat is a dog."
If you run the Amiga 1200 version on the same TV alongside this version on a same TV (with the blur filters disabled of course); it will be the same graphics. What you may be seeing is some free-aliasing given away by poor the AF signal.
Maybe they could have included it all as an optional extra, though!
They've fixed that.
I hope they release Xenon 2 as well, and do the same for that because if you have SFX and music both enabled you get the same channel dropping limitation.
(Or just the 3 player mode. Don't think a small amount of effort is too much to ask. M2 Added 2 player to the first Streets of Rage recently for example).