Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Then don't get the game. I'm not sure what you're doing here.
lol, well said.
Well, there was an standard, but the 'common people' weren't known for being wonders when it came to writing. The nobility and higher ups in the military and in the civil administration however needed to use the standard as set by the King.
However, it feels a bit idiotic and lazy to me how Ubisoft handles the subtitles. If they wanted to go 'old', do so it in the letters between people, not in the subtitles.
Lol, The Silmarillion was written between 1937 and 1954 (after the hobbit), but was rejected by the publisher which led to Tolkien to write The lord of the rings, if you mean they "way" it was written, it was written in almost the same style as a traditional copy of the old testament, which is very dry if anyone has read it... as for AC4, the way the OP has it written, I’m not too sure that is old English, could be some sort of interim ambiguous English from the Caribbean times for all I know, or maybe the devs are pulling a little "Mark Twain" and just spelling everything out slightly phonetically +^_^+