Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
In some places, anything higher than the lowest environment setting causes my fps to drop under 30 fps regardless of any other settings' levels. In those areas during a big storm i get like 22-25 fps.
It's like flipping a light switch, foliage there = fps in the 20s , remove foliage = 60 fps. Increasing the evironment detail settings beyond the level where they first popped in doesn't seem to effect fps either, once they start to be drawn it's instant tankage.
Using a 2700k with a 560ti on W7 with 8gb of ram. In most other areas, even in large towns, i can usually hold near 60 fps with nearly maxed settings. Certain spots cause minor dips to 55, 50 or 45 respectively, but remain smooth feeling and are few and hardly noticeable in gameplay. (small corners and angles I can find while testing that I would pass by in less than a second while playing and maybe not even notice) Then I end up on some Island or area with a ton of densely layed copy and paste foliage in a certain spot and it becomes a chopfest.
It's too bad they have to make one of these every year and don't have time to get then working well before they release them. And then they have to move on to the next game without fixing huge problems that tons of customers are complaining about. The oddest part of it, is that doing so makes them more successful as a game company.
Your best bet is actually enabling triple buffering, but this can only be done with an external tool (Forgot which one).
I never play games with v-sync on. Performance is still horrible in this game, way worse than, say, the Witcher 3 or GTA V(in relation to their graphics) for example. A 970 should be able to max this game with 60 fps without problems.
It's not that the FPS in locked to 30. I just have very low FPS, around 40-50. Don't get me wrong, the game is fully playable but it should run so much better with my specs.
By the way since I am gettin same cpu, how's your perforamnce on GTA V and Witcher 3?