Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
After Assassin's Creed II the story kind of derailed, the game company changed it's ways and were more interested in competing with other game companies about being the first with the newest next gen tenchnology, and that meant releasing each new game before any other company could beat them to it. Thus they had to release games that weren't really finished and which were full of bugs and glitches, and there was also no time to go in depth with what the game series originally was all about, so the story about the Assassin's and the Templar was left behind while battle was the main focus... which might have been all good, if it had worked. But too often the company didn't have the necessary time and couldn't wait with releasing games until they were finished.
They also needed a lot of money in order to remain at the top, so they pressed even more for game material to be made and released. The games are now loosely based on Assassin's Creed, but especially Black Flag has little to do with Assassin's Creed at all.
The main character, whom you play, is not even an assassin. He's a pirate and only once in a while crosses paths with Assassins and Templars, but the main gameplay is about piracy and going to battle at sea.
And in that respect the game delivers - at least enough so for most people to like playing the game.
So I will definitely say that Yes, you can easily play Black Flag without having played any Assassin's Creed game before. - Besides, there are so many expansions and so called DLC (which you have to pay for), that you would have to spend a lot of money if you had to play them all before trying out Back Flag. (Personally I didn't even finish Assassin's Creed III and have only spend an hour or so on two of the expansions, never bothering to finish them).
.........
Just one thing you might want to check out before you get Black Flag: How is your computer and internet connection with Uplay? If you have problems with games that must be played through Uplay, I would recommend you read some of the many posts about the problem people keep reporting (and no, it's not going to be fixed; Ubisoft is far into the process of creating something new and doesn't bother with Black Flag anymore). You might be lucky and find a solution, who knows.
But whether or not you launch the game from your Steam library or from a disk doesn't matter, you Have to go via Uplay or you can't play the game, there's no way around it - that I know of, anyway.
Seriously, you should make sure how your computer is with regard to Uplay for it's just a shame to buy something and then find you can't play it.
.........
This game is a game about a pirate and pirate life, the main character meets some historical figures which is fun, and both graphics and battle mechanics - especially at sea - are well made. I think, since you haven't played AC previously, that you'll also find the main story quest line interesting and perhaps challenging. The game has a lot of gather this and that content, but much of this you can ignore if you want to as it only has consequence for possible achievements.
.........
Good luck with your decision, pal. ;)
.........
P.S. I forgot to suggest that you watch a few gameplay as well as review videos about Black Flag on Youtube. That way you can get an impression of what the game looks like and about the gameplay styleand feel is.
Oh yes, if what he wants is to play an Assassin's Creed game, he should definitely get AC-I and AC-II (the best of them all) plus the expansion to AC-II. These are without question the best games in the series and dates back from when it Was about Assassin's Creed and the time when they came to know more about who the Templars are/were.
A propos the parts that take place in Abstergo... Abstergo is basically Ubisoft's department in Montreal which is where the Assassin's Creed games are made. They're playing on the fact that the Templar's identity throughout history - except from the isolated cases that we see in some of the games - is still unknown to the player, and since they have issues with keeping this part of the story alive (it's a demanding and philosophical aspect of the game that they no longer have enough time to research in depth), so they've decided to let us believe the Templars may have hidden their true identity behind what is known as a firm under the name Abstergo, which - as kind of a joke - is also "maybe" Ubisoft.
Wouldn't recommend it.
The Assassin's Creed series is linked by a rich backstory that spans the history of humanity. Real shame that people shouted down 'aliens and Desmond nonsense', leading to the post-Black Flag games as being an empty shell outside of the core game.
My personal opinion is still that the first two Assassin's Creed games are the 'Real' Assassin's Creed games, after them it became more of an exploration in next gen technology and new historical settings, but game lore wise I have seen nothing new. The focus has been on making the game play itself as fun and satisfactory as possible while keeping graphics and audio uptimized as well though this part doesn't hit home as quite as much, probably due to the time pressure of being among the next gen Best Games.
I agree. In the first two games the two time lines intertwined in a very exciting way because it seemed that actions in one time line could influence and change things in the other, and that was at least a big part of what the game was about. Now, the modern time line seems mostly to be there because well, it's tradition, people expect it. <-- Mind you, I may be wrong because since I haven't played the game to it's conclusion, so I can't know for sure that this is how it is.
Whatever the case, it's definitely a great game, particularly the graphics and the music is astonishing. I just wish there weren't so many issues and so much quirkiness with the movement and controlling it as intended.
Side note: I think you can also say that it's not so much about lore anymore, it's focusing on giving the player a fun gaming experience. This, with good graphics and audio, is the focus and seems to work because when the game play is good enough in and on itself, many players care less about lore. And after all, a lot of game use the same formula successfully and still makes it fully possible to play their games in different successions while still finding them fully satisfactory.
_________________________________________________________________________
Actually, this probably gets the closest to how I think about it too. That said, as a pirate game it's pretty damn good (if you ignore the glitches and the quirky movement mechanics that doesn't seem to like following your orders very much, lol).