Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
While in those are two it's merely poor main memory's and "fetch the stick" until kingdom come side quests coupled with a far worse mechanics control system that it's clunkyier than this predecessor and furthermore complicated because many times the characters in both those games doesn't obey your Cover command or, for another instance, the window's entrance ones.
Both AC: Unity's and AC: Syndicate's main stories are way more bland, less compelling and way less intertiwned and thus showing the lack of any actual development than any of their previous titles ones.
And if you couple that with the current Helix monetization "pay to progress faster" system being implemented way harsher by Ubi$oft upon all those Assassin's Creed games after this one, being that one extremelly more notorious upon AC: Oddyssey's debackle then I'm way happier with a far better product that was developed with care instead of those fastened production "game products" that those 2 games are and to whom you're vanelly trying to compare.
Sort of summing it all up: Your comparison, coupled with it's poorly written display pretty much becomes a choosing pick between the apple that AC IV: Black Flag was with the onions that are AC: Unity and AC: Syndicate.
Can you please stop refering to your arguments as it is if youre clashing my point, telling me "its good bcs i say so" doesnt work bcs i played both games for around 100hrs and have strong opinions about both games. Both has own pros and cons i cant argue with, i agree with some of your points about story and boring side missions, but others are just strange bcs they've been directly improved both by design of environment or by directly expanding existing features. U just decided to silence my point on stealth bcs in earlier games stealth mechanics are like not working as in other stealth action games. You didn't agree nor agree, just ignored it which is strange bcs assassin's creed is not action rpg like in later trilogy but stealth action from first game, so its pretty important mechanic. Sadly in bf combat is boring and op bcs of chain kills and stealth is impossible to do bcs game basically lacks basic stealth mechanics. (If you think jerking off in bushes is stealth that you deserve in stealth action game i would laugh in your face)
wowzies such an apple!!