安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
Certainly the class 90 and 91 'could' be used, however I would say that only the class 90 would be the appropriate choice as I don't believe the 91 has ever been used with anything other than it's own Mk4 coaches and DVT. Again, the 91 is a stand alone loco however so I guess the answer would have to yes, i 'could' be.
The reason I ask about the replacement is that whenever I change an 86 for a 90 I can't get the 90 to drive, although everything is set up as "the book". All lights are lit, everything works, parking brake off, alarms reset, outside lights, horn, wipers, etc., etc., but no drive. I asked this question about them failing to drive some weeks ago but was not able to solve the problem.
In another scenario, with a "dedicated" Class 90 I get no problems at all.
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=285605590
I don't like the 86 so I wanted to change these for Class 90's in a number of scenarios.
Simon, it's interesting that nowhere does it say to cancel the DRA, ONLY after you get a green light, except in the instructions you've linked.
Unfortunately, although I carried them out to the letter (but I had previously) I still can't get any power to the wheels. Everything is in order, all light on that should be, all light off that should be off, panto up, ETS on, parking brake cancelled, etc., etc, but still no luck.
And yes, it is the ADV version I'm trying to use so I tried to control it from the cab - without any luck.
In the early days the Class 91 was used exclusively with Mk3 coaches and Buffered Class 43's owing to the fact that no sets of Mk4's were in service at the time. As for non-Mk4 services after that it did happen occasionally, although it was incredibly rare.
http://www.traintesting.com/images/91005%20with%20MK3%20sleepers%20on%20southbound%20test%20run%20at%20Doncaster%2018-05-89.jpg
Seen 92's on ECS moves before, but not scheduled passenger services.
The 86's, particularly later in their lives, were freight locomotives. 87's were the one's allocated to express passenger duties, as they had a far superior bogie setup, and could travel at faster speeds with less wear on the trackbed. 86's were fairly quickly phased into fast freight duties, with a maximum speed of 75mph, if memory serves as it should.
I don't beleive the 92 served as a direct replacement of the 86, but it is a modern equivalent.
The Class 86 was built as a high speed passenger locomotive for use on the West Coast Mainline and later adapted to be usable on freight duties.
The Class 87 was built as a high speed passenger locomotive for use on the West Coast Mainline and later modified for export to Bulgaria.
The Class 90 was built as a high speed passenger locomotive for use on the West Coast Mainline and some were later adapted for freight duties.
The Class 92 was built as a dual voltage freight locomotive for joint use with the SNCF to be used on the Channel Tunnel.
The most modern equivalent of the Class 86 would be the Class 90, and they're still used on express passenger services to this day. The increase in high speed EMU's are what's killing this type of locomotive off, and unfortunately it seems the Class 91's may be the next to go. But the Class 92's have always been dual voltage freight locomotives pretty much dedicated to the Channel Tunnel.
I was under the impression that Class 86's spent a larger majority of their working lives on freight services, as they were replaced by 87's within 10 years of their introduction. I see where we differ now.