Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Note, the upload of said route route on a popular Dutch freeware site (a key Dutch Railworks community site) could hardly be described as illegal, at the very worst it may be considered bad form by whoever uploaded it there, should the route author have never wanted this. If that's what happened, I would always strongly recommend out of polite courtesy the uploader first contacts the respective author for their kind "permission" (which 9 times out of 10 an author will happily give if reasonably asked). However, I should point out the author never made any such requests or caveats on the initial upload of the route to UKTS, just as their are no similar type caveats of any kind with the 'new' re-upload of the route on UKTS. This is an entirely freeware route hosted on the Web that depends on many other creator produced assets to make it work. I point this out because a similar recent thread on this forum, inadvertendly suggests a number of misperceptions.
Anyway hope, those that manage the marathon of file downloads for The Estwaite Branch, very much enjoy this fine route. Kind regards.
Now what do you see ?
Forgive me, without wishout to facetious, but what am I supposed to see? Everything I wrote stands. It's exactly the same route of 3 years ago, the same on that is on the Treinpunt.nl site as was noted several weeks ago (which was harshly/incorrectly called illegal). Pluse the route does also require many further asset downloads as I've also pointed out is the case, to make it work. The many extra files are given a txt readme file with the main .rwp download for the route. All the best.
yes it needs 63 files not includine dp derek siddles websites
The AP station pack is bundled with many routes available on Steam so you should probably have that already
I don't have the files 29428, 28205 or 27068 and I run the route without noticing anything missing so they shouldn't be important.
27139 is the UKTS wagon pack, you could try disabling your anti virus software before downloading it.
The route will load fine without issue, it just won't display the assets it can't find. It's possible these were assests that the author has removed from UKTS or they have been re-uploaded with a different file id.
It's quite common with Freeware routes that there may be a few bits and bobs that I don't have or can't find but it's usually fine if it's only somethign small.
If you have RWtools that might provide a clue to what the missing assets are if you're trying to track them down.
I found an easier way. When loading the route, when it says what it failed to load, all i have to do is click F2 and then save. Because of that, I was able to get in the route and drive all the way to Esthwaite.