Dying Light

Dying Light

View Stats:
Hey guys, anyone with GTX660?
Have you guys played this game with GTX660, 8GB RAM and i5-2500,3.3GHz or similiar? I am wondering if I can somehow run the game in 1920x1080 with stable 60fps. Thanks
< >
Showing 1-13 of 13 comments
David20Player Apr 2, 2017 @ 9:30am 
I don't have a GTX 660 but I would say that your best bet for a stable 60 frames per second would be to have all the graphic settings set to their lowest settings in-game including the draw distance.

Here is a guy with most of the graphic settings set to medium with your card and he is getting 30-40 fps mainly.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6qOmQ2XH8U
Last edited by David20Player; Apr 2, 2017 @ 9:39am
BonesawMcGraw Apr 2, 2017 @ 9:40am 
Probably close to 60 at least. My buddy has a 660 and he runs most of his settings on high (not ultra) and he never complains. A lot of the settings that eat up your memory are things you don't even notice when you turn them off, so you should be good.
Blade Master Apr 2, 2017 @ 9:48am 
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=S6SK3YA8mAA

Yes, most likely somewhere 60 fps, you'll need to tweak your settings.
David20Player Apr 2, 2017 @ 9:53am 
I saw that video that BladeMaster posted and I have a really hard time believing that you can get that kind of frame rate with High Settings. Even some people made a comment about it on youtube. I could be wrong but I don't think that video is 100% telling the truth.

Maybe the video that BladeMaster posted forgot to tell us that he is running 2 GTX 660's in SLI or he is running at 480P resolution or something like that.
Last edited by David20Player; Apr 2, 2017 @ 10:00am
Blade Master Apr 2, 2017 @ 10:10am 
There are more videos.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=EjKlcSwj8jU

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5zVTyTpaD4g

I'm on mobile now though, can't see everything clearly.

View distance is performance destroyer so it should be set to 0.
demonpingis Apr 2, 2017 @ 10:40am 
i run it with an rx480 8gb of ram and an i5 6400k
demonpingis Apr 2, 2017 @ 10:41am 
turn viewing distance down and antialising off if that doesnt help just turn down the graphics quality
demonpingis Apr 2, 2017 @ 10:41am 
i run pretty much everything on high but that shiuld help
Lord Sithspit Apr 2, 2017 @ 11:11am 
Thanks for answers, I´ll try the game tomorrow
Jurassic Fart 2 Apr 2, 2017 @ 1:15pm 
I learned the hard way about low-end hardware (and AMD). So, I sacrificed and saved for about a year (I was building my own rigs) and was able to custom-order a really decent Intel rig for $1,600: water-cooled i5 6600K, 16 GB Skilljaws SDRAM III, GTX 970 @ 2 GB. That was a year ago, and I still get great performance with every game I've bought, even the newest ones.

To get the rig you need—if your income is modest as is mine—you might have to stop buying games for a while (as you save rather than spend).

Another thing helped me to save (which I do NOT recommend): I was laid up in the hospital for four-and-a-half months after being run over by an uninsured cell-phone driver.
Last edited by Jurassic Fart 2; Apr 2, 2017 @ 1:15pm
Little FATRAY Apr 2, 2017 @ 1:18pm 
i have a 570
SaltnPepper Apr 2, 2017 @ 2:36pm 
Have an i7-2600, GTX 460, and 16gbs of ram. With most settings turn to low except for textures which is set to high/ultra, I get about 40-60 fps :)
AizenSA Apr 2, 2017 @ 3:11pm 
I have a 660ti ang 8gbs of ram, mine i son medium settings all across teh board, and not really any lag for me at all its been pretty stable.
< >
Showing 1-13 of 13 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Apr 2, 2017 @ 9:24am
Posts: 13