Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Well, yeah, EZIC being amazing is definitely a valid possibility. I was wondering if I've missed some sort of evidence indicating this to be the case. Something I've missed perhaps. Because if it were a real life scenario, I wouldn't risk my or my family's safety to support a rebel group without at least some indication that they genuinely turn Arstotzka into a better place.
That said if Republia Times, another game made by the same creator, is anything to go by then an overthrow of the government may yield little difference. Really it's all just on chance it might be better, nothing is sure in this world.
Our worker is under communism severe control, without liberty. Almost starving and can't feed his family.
A good ending for you and family would be to help EZIC , or not ,but still manage to escape the country
The following logic might be plausible:
1. Per the ending where you escape the country, you know that other countries are in rough shape.
2. Per the ending where you do your job and nothing changes, you know that doing nothing means ongoing hardships.
But (1) and (2) are meta knowledge.
3. Being a citizen, let us assume that you inherently understand (1) and (2), and know that nowhere is currently safe or thriving.
Or to put another way, you know bad state of your country, and news reports show other countries likewise bad.
Best case is there is at least ONE other country that is good, but your news media would never admit it.
4. By initially helping EZIC, they give you significant money, which proves they are non-trivial, and working towards a common cause.
They money *could* be counterfeit, but that's besides the point, since it is still a bribe that you have the option of using.
The point is that EZIC does not appear to be a common smuggling operation.
Worst case, EZIC is revealed to be a common smuggling operation, which you can disavow if this proves to be the case.
5. So by aiding EZIC, you help bring about change, and the game ends without elaborating.
However, you are now one of their agents.
They state that they need agents, which implies an intent to "bring down" all the other authoritarian countries, with the hope that something grander will result.
piecing together the ezic clues is fun but they mostly solve themselves anyway