Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
People are positing that post-process FX are simply bugged at this point. I'd be inclined to agree at this point. The idea that this all isn't broken but is by design is saddening.
Now a comparison shot of the original game
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=189106646
Notice how the shadow isn't homogeneous?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGB27zgAcDU
That's not a solution, FXAA is well known to blur the image, on my system (690) the vanilla runs very well with MLAA plus SMAA (through injector) and without graphical glitches of any kind.
Straight speaking, to me it seems they ♥♥♥♥♥♥ it up.
If someone says @ this point that the Director's Cut version looks better then the orginal then there is definitely something wrong with your eyes.
If someone still dont believe me here,s the proof
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGB27zgAcDU
Minor, I know, but coupled with all the other issues it feels like this is a worse version than the original, not really worthy of the directors cut name.