Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
So for instance, if you have something like A K Q 10, you're just praying for a Jack, but if you have something like 10 9 8 7, you can either look for a Jack or a 6 for the straight. Cutting both ends will ensure that you'll draw those middle straight more consistently.
Ideally you want a 10-high straight as Face Cards has higher debuff risk, so try to remove everything outside 10 9 8 7 6 range - that also means Death those cards into 10 9 8 7 6 when you have the chance. Only go for Face Cards straight if you want to rely on Photograph + Hanging Chad.
Else, the 2 previous posts I agree with. I'd rather get rid of face cards before 2's and 3's. Because of bosses in general, plus Hack is a thing.
It's not the optimal way, but you can still have that work. You gotta change your discard strategy, though, to do so.
Like, if you cut out 8s, and 7s entirely, you're left with two viable six-card ranges to build a straight from.
You look at your opening hand, and it's A Q Q J 5 4 2 right?
You've got 3 cards towards a "high end" straight, and 4 cards towards a "low end" straight.
So if chips from the cards aren't a consideration, the obvious choice is to shoot for the "low end."
This can make decision-making a little more simple, and once you make that decision, you still get a benefit from a thinner deck of cards to pull what you need from.
If you manage it, and can get 9s and 6s out too, that thinning benefit (at least perceptually, I haven't done the actual math) gets better.
Once it comes time to pick a side though, as soon as you do delete that first 10 or 5, things get worse for you in terms of consistency.
Though, hounestly, if you're to the point of removing your 17th card from your deck, you probably have some way of getting even more removal, so that probably won't be that big of an issue.
I've definitely won a couple of times on low-stakes pulling cards out of the middle, trying too hard to optimize for Superposition, lol. If I'm gunning for a win on higher stakes, I'd probably avoid it, but it can be a fun thing to play around with.
Hounestly, if you're thoughtful about it, doing strategically bad things and messing around and experimenting is going to deepen your innate understanding of the game's mechanics, and you'll be a more skilled player for it.
Just, you know, be ready for a lot of those experiments to blow up in your face and kill your run, lol.