Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I guess a truly random mode would be fun, but probably it would be hard to code and balance somehow. Still, congratulations to the developers for making this gem!
Have a good day everyone.
"Anyone who attempts to generate random numbers by deterministic means is, of course, living in a state of sin."
– John von Neumann
Well, I think that sharing a seed would still be a valid option since you could choose to try a scenario that someone else has played, but I agree on the fact that if you don't savescum then playing a random seed it's like playing a random match.
Also I noticed that the cards show themselves in a specific order, which doesn't mean they appear in the same moment of the game. For example if the next two cards are two Kings you can get them as new cards by discarding two cards as an action, but if you're playing the last hand and you don't discard anything, you can get them in the next round as the first two new cards, instead of getting them exclusively if you discard. So in the end what a player does effectively change the outcome of the match, which is the true important thing actually.