Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Do you want your hand to count as a:
flush house
flush
full house
3 of a kind
2 pairs
pair
high card
No thanks, I'll pass. It would also make high card and pairs even better than they already are. That would be a big problem.
Well then at least make it context sensitive for certain boss blinds. For example a Royal Flush should also count as a straight, so you don't auto-fail the blind.
I get what you're saying with this. However, as this game doesn't strictly adhere to the rules of Poker in as much as things like Flush Houses even exist, and further to that in certain situations a simple Flush could outscore a Flush House, I think it is actually quite an important thing to add especially where there are bosses that restrict what hands can be played.
Seeing as how strategy is very important, I think this would actually be a QOL feature that is needed.
I'd rather accept that I need to dodge Full Houses to get my high level Two Pair points. It makes the game more challenging and quicker to play.
Your definition of QoL is pretty loose if such a change would be just that to you, a QoL feature.
Many strategic decisions are the product of the automatic hand type selection and automatic scoring of the played cards.
Playing a full house and having the possibility to count it as a pair drags the game to a sub white stake level. Might be interesting to you. Definitely isn't to me. It'd break the game and I'll trust the dev to not make his own game less strategic.
First of all, a Royal Flush is a nice name, but it's a straight flush.
So your view is that a straight flush should also count as a straight.
By that logic, it should also count as a flush.
Why should it be that way? Because for you, The Mouth is too difficult. Fine.
With those new rules...
When facing The Eye, if my opening hand is a straight flush, then my 2nd hand couldn't be a straight flush, a flush or a straight. You see how, by suggesting something that would lessen your struggle against The Mouth, you just made The Eye an even more terrifying foe than it already is?
And I'm 100% confident that for the vast majority of players, The Eye ends more runs than The Mouth does, even before such change.
And then what, if you pick high card, you have to select which of the 5 cards you want to score?
Players tend to like clean UI. They also tend to not like layers upon layers of menus when they are not necessary.
Simply applying current algorithm of picking high card from a hand would be enough.
I was just confused that an unknown to me and non-listed hand type ruined my strategy. I'm fine if this is intended situation, but at least some clarification would be nice to have, like an additional message in the tutorial that highest hand type including *magical* ones always take precedence.
Maybe choosing from all the matches is too much. But as an example switching between Flush House/Flush Royale and Flush by hitting some hotkey would not hurt anyone.