Frame Generation doesn't seem to work

[Ichika]

Is anyone having issues with frame generation (FSR 3) doing absolutely nothing ? on the benchmark it was working but not in the actual game, i had to go and use lossless scaling instead which is weird, (GPU is a 3070 and the game gets around 55-60fps but on the benchmark it was around 84)

EDIT: restarting the game actually made it work, though it looks way too smeared with frames, i might just try and lock to 45 and play with lossless scaling instead

[Kou]

3070 doesn't support frame generation. you need a 4000 card for that

[Simulacrum111]

Originally posted by Kougeru:

3070 doesn't support frame generation. you need a 4000 card for that

I don't have an Nvidia GPU to test with but I think frame generation is supported on nearly all hardware. AMD frame generation works on Nvidia 30XX GPUs for sure.

[james01]

For me, no noticeable difference but artificially pad the FPS counter, it doubles the Number, but nothing noticeable.

[zokuva]

Originally posted by Kougeru:

3070 doesn't support frame generation. you need a 4000 card for that

thats only for dlss framegen, fsr framegen does not require RTX 4000

[Chasing Amnesia?]

Originally posted by Kougeru:

3070 doesn't support frame generation. you need a 4000 card for that

Except you can use AMD's FrameGen? Why are you talking when you don't know

[Chasing Amnesia?]

Originally posted by Ichika:

Is anyone having issues with frame generation (FSR 3) doing absolutely nothing ? on the benchmark it was working but not in the actual game, i had to go and use lossless scaling instead which is weird, (GPU is a 3070 and the game gets around 55-60fps but on the benchmark it was around 84)

Didn't seem to enable for me in game either I had to enable it in my drivers with AMD

[Ichika]

Originally posted by Chasing Amnesia?:

Originally posted by Ichika:

Is anyone having issues with frame generation (FSR 3) doing absolutely nothing ? on the benchmark it was working but not in the actual game, i had to go and use lossless scaling instead which is weird, (GPU is a 3070 and the game gets around 55-60fps but on the benchmark it was around 84)

Didn't seem to enable for me in game either I had to enable it in my drivers with AMD

Yeah i will have to check on that, restarting the game increased the framerate but it feels "bad" somehow, like it's all smeared, maybe i have to use some motion blur or remove it completely, i never really used frame gen before

[Simulacrum111]

Originally posted by Ichika:

Originally posted by Chasing Amnesia?:

Didn't seem to enable for me in game either I had to enable it in my drivers with AMD

Yeah i will have to check on that, restarting the game increased the framerate but it feels "bad" somehow, like it's all smeared, maybe i have to use some motion blur or remove it completely, i never really used frame gen before

FG is not like upscaling. FG is not going to smear the entire screen in the same way. If the entire screen seems blurry and your character is at a stand still, it is likely due to a low starting resolution or too aggressive upscaling.

The default 50% resolution upscale it too aggressive unless you are targeting 4K.

FG does have problems with high speed motion, so if the screen seems clear until you start to move then something is wrong with FG. Not something I have seen with reasonable movement in this game.

FG is definitely going to be better than using motion blur, IMO. Motion blur will smear the entire screen as this is what it is designed to do. If you want clarity and you are not turning the screen 180 degrees non-stop then FG will usually be okay and much better than motion blur.

You may just be sensitive to artifacts that FG can produce when motion is too fast. If that is the case then don't use it.

[Ichika]

Originally posted by Simulacrum111:

Originally posted by Ichika:

Yeah i will have to check on that, restarting the game increased the framerate but it feels "bad" somehow, like it's all smeared, maybe i have to use some motion blur or remove it completely, i never really used frame gen before

FG is not like upscaling. FG is not going to smear the entire screen in the same way. If the entire screen seems blurry and your character is at a stand still, it is likely due to a low starting resolution or too aggressive upscaling.

The default 50% resolution upscale it too aggressive unless you are targeting 4K.

FG does have problems with high speed motion, so if the screen seems clear until you start to move then something is wrong with FG. Not something I have seen with reasonable movement in this game.

FG is definitely going to be better than using motion blur, IMO. Motion blur will smear the entire screen as this is what it is designed to do. If you want clarity and you are not turning the screen 180 degrees non-stop then FG will usually be okay and much better than motion blur.

You may just be sensitive to artifacts that FG can produce when motion is too fast. If that is the case then don't use it.

yeah that might seem to be the case, i will try to check things later, i'm currently playing at 1440p with 50% sharpness, maybe i will ramp up to 75% and disable motion blur completely while keeping FG, without FG i can't seem to keep a stable 60fps

[Simulacrum111]

Originally posted by Ichika:

Originally posted by Simulacrum111:

FG is not like upscaling. FG is not going to smear the entire screen in the same way. If the entire screen seems blurry and your character is at a stand still, it is likely due to a low starting resolution or too aggressive upscaling.

The default 50% resolution upscale it too aggressive unless you are targeting 4K.

FG does have problems with high speed motion, so if the screen seems clear until you start to move then something is wrong with FG. Not something I have seen with reasonable movement in this game.

FG is definitely going to be better than using motion blur, IMO. Motion blur will smear the entire screen as this is what it is designed to do. If you want clarity and you are not turning the screen 180 degrees non-stop then FG will usually be okay and much better than motion blur.

You may just be sensitive to artifacts that FG can produce when motion is too fast. If that is the case then don't use it.

yeah that might seem to be the case, i will try to check things later, i'm currently playing at 1440p with 50% sharpness, maybe i will ramp up to 75% and disable motion blur completely while keeping FG, without FG i can't seem to keep a stable 60fps

Hardware Unboxed has a good optimzation guide on Youtube. I suggest you seek it out as it might be able to help you.

I personally have no problems with FG but they will show you some methods to get good perfomance without it if you, personally, are too negatively affected by FG.

Obviously, it will depend on your hardware how much flexibility you have.

[Ichika]

Originally posted by Simulacrum111:

Originally posted by Ichika:

yeah that might seem to be the case, i will try to check things later, i'm currently playing at 1440p with 50% sharpness, maybe i will ramp up to 75% and disable motion blur completely while keeping FG, without FG i can't seem to keep a stable 60fps

Hardware Unboxed has a good optimzation guide on Youtube. I suggest you seek it out as it might be able to help you.

I personally have no problems with FG but they will show you some methods to get good perfomance without it if you, personally, are too negatively affected by FG.

Obviously, it will depend on your hardware how much flexibility you have.

I did watch that video while i was downloading the game, but yeah i get around 45-55fps without FG, wouldn't say is unplayable but it doesn't really feel good, currently have a 3070, 5800x3D and 32gb of ram, i will try few things and see if i can make it feel better, thank you!