Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
The only thing the numbers prove is that a lot of votes came in. If you need a theory on why Wukongs percentage went down dramatically, a spam purge is the most logical explanation. The idea that IGN would have to submit fake votes to impact it's own poll is nonsense; if IGN wanted Wukong to lose they could've made it lose immediately.
From your first post in this thread, you are accusing without any detailed data and proof, only with prejudice and pure imagination.
The fact is that no bot purge will lower the win rate and raise the total number of duel at the same time, at that large scale and in that short period of time. The only possibility is IGN adding a large number negative duels to Wukong directly.
I have seen the changing data in real time in the past hours and I'm not the only one, People on X and reddit who have seen the data all think IGN was cheating. Maybe everyone is a baby except you, because we make our judgement on real data, while you make yours based on your imagination of IGN.
Your theory is that IGN wants Wukong to lose, but apparently didn't realize that they can directly control the results of a poll on their website, so instead just submitted a bunch of fake votes to their own site. It's so ridiculous I doubt you actually believe it.
My theory is that they did the same kind of spam purge that every open online poll needs to do. That makes more sense.
And you couldn't quote any single valid IGN review of it as it is a non existent attributes and it is irrelevant to GOTY quality. And you intentionally skipped reply me Sekiro stuff. Twitch 177 views now, Steam chart show its peak and total hours played are far less than Wukong
Bro, do you know what you look like? You’re like an actor hired by IGN, desperately defending their fabricated data.
If you were a genuine gamer, there’s no way you’d praise IGN and criticize *Black Myth* to this illogical extent. Among real gamers who actually pay to play, how many do you think still trust IGN? IGN’s credibility has fallen so far, and your desperate attempts to dress it up aren’t going to change that. Have you even considered the root of why so many people doubt IGN’s credibility? The way you argue and the direction you take are all about defending IGN’s data manipulation. Aren’t you just acting?
And let’s set aside whether *Black Myth* is a masterpiece for now. It’s definitely an outstanding game, especially in a year like 2024 when the output of AAA games is low. Whether it wins Game of the Year, I don’t know, but it’s definitely worthy of a nomination. At first, you pointed out objective issues like the lack of map guidance and invisible walls, which is reasonable. But when you started attacking it for having a shallow story and poor combat pacing, that’s when you gave yourself away.
Plus, based on your other responses, it’s obvious you don’t really care whether *Elden Ring* or *Final Fantasy VII Remake* wins first place. What you care about is that *Black Myth* dropping in rank isn’t controlled by IGN.
Someone who doesn’t care about which game takes first place but only cares about whether IGN’s reputation is damaged—you expect me to believe you’re a gamer and not an actor? Who’s going to believe that?
If you can’t shake off the suspicion of being an actor, then stop coming out to defend your boss IGN with pointless arguments. No one’s going to hate IGN any less because of your illogical analysis.
As for IGN's open polling, botting is pretty much a guarantee. The point is that IGN was going to have to do it spam purge at some point and I'm honestly not surprised that Wukong was the most heavily impacted by it.
The claim that there is bot purge is something that you have to prove.
The only reason you can give is what I wrote in the original post, that the win rate of Wukong went down dramatically fast. But the dramatical decrease can be caused by different reasons, bot purging is not the only possibility, and also there are evidences against the hypothesis of "bot purging".
Your argument is not enough and not solid to prove your accusing of bot purging, you make this judgement based on your prejudice and your "belief" that IGN will not cheat, either of these two reasons is subjective feeling and thoughts, and can not be taken as "proof". If you want to claim there is bot and the data changing is caused by bot purging, go find the proof in data screenshots and data recordings, go ahead.
I also buy some games on steam because I like to play around with them on my Laptop at work. At home I prefer to play on PS5, though.
And no idea what you mean about quoting a valid IGN review. IGN's Wukong review specifically was very fair.
The idea that IGN would have to submit fake votes to THEIR OWN WEBSITE to manipulate THEIR POLL is incredibly stupid, though. If they wanted Wukong to lose it would've never been first place to begin with. Use your heads.
You just all wanted Wukong to be GoTY, you were glad that IGN was getting spammed and you're mad that IGN removed the spam.