Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
BM: Wukong is a good game, but nothing more. It has some known technical, optimization, visual, and game design flaws, which makes the game not excellent and far from perfection. For example, I rated it a 7 out of 10.
However, despite its flaws, it sets a good foundation and AAA debut for Game Science overall.
I don't think so, the same happens with many meaningless, biased, or simply extreme or exaggerated user reviews in the other direction and they are rating it with 10, 9, or 8. Conspiranoid theories apart, I don't see anything strange when you know how this Metacritic review system works with ratings ranging from 0 to 10 in a game as popular and over-hyped.
I didn't suggest to put a 10, only to be fair.
These should be ignored but I don't know if MetaCritic will do anything to be fair with Wukong.
People, yes. "Gamers" aren't the only ones buying games.
The current Metacritic user score seems pretty fair, indeed. It's always a matter of statistics and big numbers. I wouldn't be much concerned about extreme ratings. The current user score picture seems accurate and fair: about a 7.5 out of 10 on average, generally favorable.