安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
However, the score is true. You might argue that it shouldn't be in the "overwhelming" category, but OW2 is just a bad game.
wish it wasn't this way but whatever
As I said, the community isn't a single entity. I was addressing this specifically because they might not be the same people. But it does show a pattern. It also means the people playing aren't, at best, leaving a positive review. And that still says something.
Can you explain why steam Community reviews are mostly negative, and why people have the toxic behavior to review bomb a game they don't play.
ChatGPT
Steam Community reviews can often be polarized, with a mix of positive and negative reviews, for several reasons:
Emotional Responses: Games often evoke strong emotions, both positive and negative. People who are dissatisfied with a game are more motivated to express their opinions than those who are content. This can lead to a disproportionate number of negative reviews.
Expectation Mismatch: Sometimes, players have high expectations for a game based on marketing, previews, or previous entries in a series. If the game doesn't meet those expectations, players might feel disappointed and leave negative reviews.
Technical Issues: Bugs, glitches, crashes, and performance problems can greatly impact players' experiences. When a game is riddled with technical issues, players are more likely to leave negative reviews.
Subjective Taste: Different players have different preferences when it comes to gameplay mechanics, graphics, storytelling, and other aspects of a game. What some players enjoy, others might dislike, leading to differing reviews.
Change in Mechanics or Design: If a game series takes a new direction or changes fundamental gameplay mechanics, it can alienate longtime fans, resulting in negative reviews.
As for review bombing and toxic behavior, these can be attributed to several factors:
Group Mentality: People tend to be influenced by the opinions of others, especially in online communities. When one person starts criticizing a game, it can trigger a cascade of negativity as others join in without even playing the game themselves.
Social Media and Forums: Platforms like Reddit, Twitter, and gaming forums can magnify negative sentiments. People see negative comments and may adopt those opinions without firsthand experience.
Perceived Injustice or Controversy: Sometimes, players might not be upset with the game itself, but with the actions of the developers or publishers, such as a controversial decision or policy. This can lead to review bombing as a form of protest.
Attention-Seeking: Some individuals might engage in toxic behavior or review bombing to draw attention to themselves or to promote their agenda, even if it's unrelated to the game.
Lack of Accountability: The anonymity and distance provided by the internet can reduce the sense of responsibility for one's actions. People might be more likely to engage in negative behavior when they feel they won't face direct consequences.
It's important to note that negative reviews and review bombing do not necessarily reflect the overall quality of a game. They might represent a vocal minority or be based on factors that aren't directly related to the game's content. When evaluating reviews, it's advisable to consider a variety of sources and opinions to form a well-rounded understanding of a game's strengths and weaknesses.