Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
-Ren
Personally, I think it's weird when people request (or more often, outright demand) multiplayer in a game clearly designed from the beginning as a singleplayer experience; they're asking for time and resources to be diverted to something that might not even mechanically work, and they sure as hell never offer an explanation on how it might work when asked. "Errr, just make it happen!"
Probably because the ones that have or add multiplayer are 1000% more popular and played? Look at VS. Their play numbers shot up like 3000% after MP was added. Now they pump out dlc like coins from a winning slot machine at vegas!
Look at Darkwood: never added multiplayer but people made documentaries and university theses about it.
Popularity and profit also straight up don't matter to a lot of folks.
'A lot of folks' do not include the ones making the game. Or the ones that want the devs to have the capital to make more games and content. Thanks for the pointless comment though.
Says the person grossly generalizing and assuming on behalf of entire swaths of people. :3
Nice try, but my OP says nothing other than VS being way more popular after getting MP. The only assuming that has been done is by you.