安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Je nachdem welche anderen Eigenschaften die Waffe besitzt, kann es trotzdem sinnvoll sein, eine Waffe mit weniger DPS zu benutzen.
Im Fall von Merris empfiehlt es sich (je nach Build / Art wie du spielen willst) auf Spell-damage (Zauberschaden) oder Summon-Damage (Schaden der Untergebenen) zu gehen
Depending on what other properties the weapon has, it may still make sense to use a weapon with less DPS.
In the case of Merris, it is advisable (depending on the build / way you want to play) to go for Spell Damage or Summon Damage
At first I thought the weapon had another advantage, but it only increases my attack speed by +0.10, which can't keep up with -50% damage.
But why would you build weapons that are even worse than no weapon at all or just the standard weapon? Just so you can sell them?
Only an increase in attack speed and attack damage, neither of which is even close to enough in this case.