Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Unless this game has literally cut and pasted content from DG, there are no compyright implications to speak of.
Quick - name a single game that has successfully sued another for copyright violations... good luck!
This is beyond borrowing ideas, 2 games look and play exactly the same. So much that majority of people think this is defense grid 2.
Saying all that I am currently about an hour into the game and must say it's very good. I will be doing a video or two soon on Mackscorner, my YT channel.
And I say this as a big fan of DG. So games borrowing things from one another does not automatically make it bad, as long as the new game offers new perspective or variations that the old game didn't explore.
So there are "inspired by" and there are "we think our lawyers can take you" levels of cloning. Who knew?
"According to several urban legends, Nintendo opened a lawsuit case against Gessert and Hülsbeck, because Nintendo saw a direct copyright infringement to its new game Super Mario Bros. But in fact, there has never been such a lawsuit. Neither Nintendo, nor the German programmers claim to be privy to any lawsuits. This myth was created shortly after the game was taken out of stores. Nintendo itself later admitted to have influenced the stop of sales personally, as it did already before with other games."
And according to www.movie-cenorship.com the katakis creators were also not sued.
"This resemblance was apparently too obvious, since Activision, which owned the rights for R-Type, was not quite happy about it and threatened with a lawsuit (today, suing somebody because of a game concept is something totally unthinkable). However, they recognized Trenz’s talent and offered him a deal: Rainbow Arts was supposed to program the R-Type versions for the C64 and the Amiga (the latter was delegated to Factor 5) and was in return allowed to sell an altered version of Katakis again.
The rest is history; R-Type was released for both systems and Katakis was altered for some parts and then remade and sold under the name of “Denaris”."
So if the above is true then neither were sued which means no one has been sued yet.
However I will leave you with this http://www.gamingonlinux.com/articles/7-days-to-die-taken-down-from-steam.2622
I'm not saying a lawsuit war should begin but boy does it leave a bad taste in my mouth looking at this. Just wow.
I've yet to see something that would give it a unique twist that would be enjoyable and get me to buy the game, but I'm going to keep poking around. Maybe there's something unique and redeamable about it.
Where is the logic i ask?