Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Black Ops 2 zombies was meh, the maps were mediocre and not well thought out.
Black Ops 3 zombies is pure trash.
KF overall feels more fun to play, it's more satisfying when you get a headshot and there's a variety of zeds. Team play is more important and roles exists to cover each zed and situation. CoD zombies is just "get a good gun and buy perks to help you survive". KF is more about managing your position, teammates and threats.
Could say more, but KF, specifically KF2 takes the medal imo for me
Only thing is CoD zombies were a side mode while KF1 & 2 focuses on that side mode entirely.
So it's like CoD is mostly pvp with a pve sidegame while KF2 is a mostly PvE with a small pvp sidegame.
World at war (at not of i think id remeber exactly but 90% sure).
But yeah that CoD zombies was OKAY. Then again it WAS one of the first so it's understandable.
So I will say this.
but to each their own.
Also cannot really compare the 2 since my above statement rests that they each focus more on different aspects. So if you want a better PvE experience KF2. PvP CoD since KF2 doesn't have a good PvP gamemode atm.
BO2 zombies i hated since the starting map is terrible and hated the whole be online aspect for basically a single player mode with multiplayer functions.
BO3 dunno.