Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Adding mass will also increase surface pressure and greenhouse effect. IR emissivity is internal heat from the core. There are more options for Mars and Earth as far as climate goes however all bodies that are not a star or black hole will use the 4 generic options
Earth and Mars have more advanced climate models, and all rocky bodies (whether randomly generated or known like Mercury, Venus, Pluto, etc) have the generic atmosphere properties Callipso mentioned.
So if you want to experiment with a Planet Nine with an atmosphere, you'll have to replace it with a rocky planet.
I hope that helps. You bring up a good point that this can be a bit confusing because it's not clear why it doesn't have those properties that are seen on other planets. We'll discuss how we can improve this. :)
EDIT: Actually, how would I replace the gas giant with a rocky planet, and have the exact same orbit and mass?
For now, you will have to manually do it. Add a rocky planet orbiting the Sun, then pause the sim and set its mass and orbital elements to match Planet Nine's.
Also, just yesterday we were talking about how we can improve object categorization. In the future, this should be more flexible, so it wouldn't be "stuck" as a gas giant, for example.