To all the Bad Reviews

[Toxin Rayn]

I've noticed a common theme among everyone complaining of graphics issues. Everyone of you that listed out your hardware had an AM5 CPU. There was a Mix of Nvidia and Radeon cards. Though why you'd run an Nvidia with an AMD CPU I don't get. Despite the cross compatibility it's still a handicap compared to AMD-Radeon. That extends all the way to the motherboard and how it communicates between the two. I see some of you saying how this game uses in the teens of your CPU and 90-100% of your GPU. Interesting indeed. As I run a Ryzen 9 5950x 16c clocked to 5.7ghz, 7900XTX and 64 GB of DDR4 3600 Ram and have yet to find a game that brings the CPU usage to or above 10%. Normally it sits at 2-5% for all games. This includes FS2020 which anyone who plays MSFS knows it's a CPU heavy game and always has been.

[AG2590]

Yep.

AMD has always been budget gaming. Naturally these people blame the game.

[Playaffe]

Just dumb kids tryna play on their old laptops

[Blizzard]

Originally posted by AG2590:

Yep.

AMD has always been budget gaming. Naturally these people blame the game.

Intel fanboy lol

Edit:
Ryzen 7 7900X3D beats i9-13900KS in benchmarks at almost half the price, and its just Ryzen 7 and not 9. :skull:

Intel barely innovates nowadays, and just rides on its history. It keeps ripping off their users in terms of price to performance ratio.

My guy, until Intel steps up their game, and revisions their pricing, it will continue to be a bad value option.

[Energritz]

Always take reviews with a grain of salt, i mean anyone with a brain can make the decision themselves.. also everyone's hardware and configurations are different. Mixing brands has no performance impacts, if it did then every game with a review box would be downvoted to obilivion so the comment about AMD cpu & nvidia gpu being paired together is just load of crap to be honest..

[Blizzard]

Originally posted by Energritz:

Always take reviews with a grain of salt, i mean anyone with a brain can make the decision themselves.. also everyone's hardware and configurations are different. Mixing brands has no performance impacts, if it did then every game with a review box would be downvoted to obilivion so the comment about AMD cpu & nvidia gpu being paired together is just load of crap to be honest..

True. My personal issue after trying out the game is that it runs worse then 22, and looks worse then 22.
I love new features, im excited for actual ground deformation and ability to dig in, but man. Optimise your titles (additionally, god they really do be hoping for modders to add more stuff, as in game variaty is I think worst we ever seen in the series)

[whitepawrolls]

If your getting bad performance check the graphics settings. I noticed the "default auto" was too high. I set them to match FS22 and they smoothed out. As for a reason to mix Nividia and AMD I can think of only one good reason, and that is for streaming. I noticed OBS uses Nivida hardware encoding, but not for AMD gpu's. Also guys and gals remember this is day 1 release. there are bound to be issues. Up till now the devs had little to go on from the small base of pre release people to use for tracking bugs, and optimizing.

[Drewcifer]

I mean ok? But odd that my ryzen 9 and 4060 can't run farming sim 25 without constant hitching and flickering black screen? Not going to get into a debate about it. Just def blaming the game when everything I run will run at max settings without any issues.

Obviously the game just came out and I'm sure patches with sort issues out but to say its just abunch of kids playing on potato laptops isn't really true of the issue at hand.

[AG2590]

Originally posted by Blizzard:

Originally posted by AG2590:

Yep.

AMD has always been budget gaming. Naturally these people blame the game.

Intel fanboy lol

Edit:
Ryzen 7 7900X3D beats i9-13900KS in benchmarks at almost half the price, and its just Ryzen 7 and not 9. :skull:

Intel barely innovates nowadays, and just rides on its history. It keeps ripping off their users in terms of price to performance ratio.

My guy, until Intel steps up their game, and revisions their pricing, it will continue to be a bad value option.

AMD fanboy lol

Intel CPU and Nvidia GPU will always get you the highest stability and framerate.

Innovation and "half the price" is irrelevant. You want the best performance and willing to spend the top $ you go Intel + Nvidia.

[illgib]

Originally posted by AG2590:

Originally posted by Blizzard:

Intel fanboy lol

Edit:
Ryzen 7 7900X3D beats i9-13900KS in benchmarks at almost half the price, and its just Ryzen 7 and not 9. :skull:

Intel barely innovates nowadays, and just rides on its history. It keeps ripping off their users in terms of price to performance ratio.

My guy, until Intel steps up their game, and revisions their pricing, it will continue to be a bad value option.

AMD fanboy lol

Intel CPU and Nvidia GPU will always get you the highest stability and framrate.

Innovation and "half the price" is irrelevant. You want the best performance and willing to spend the top $ you go Intel + Nvidia.

Considering most game engines (and i bet Giants won't be any different since it's ancient) rarely use more than 1 or two cores, Amd was always much better on single core speed than Intel.

[Doc Clarke]

Well this "Don't run an AMD CPU with an Nvidia GPU" is just...just an awful take.
Almost every tester out there tests all CPU's at 1080 with a 4090
There is no "Now look, we know we should test with an AMD CPU but we want to nerf the results"
Gamers Nexus, HW:U, even the braniacs at Forge run 4090's to test their AMD CPU's.
When someone makes the point of incompatibility they carefully and politely tell them what a load of horse droppings that idea is.
It is not a problem. Hasn't been for years and years.
It was sort of an issue about 2006 with the FX53 and FX57 and not liking Nvidia 7800 and struggling with SLI and stuff like that. But that was almost 20 years ago.
Running AMD CPU with Nvidia GPU offers ZERO issues in any other application or game from the last 15+ years.
If it does (inexplicably) cause incompatibility issues in FS 25 then that is entirely down to FS 25
But it doesn't the game is just not optimised as well as it could be at launch
As usual, as with every game ever in the series, they will fix it over the next 12 months and mods will fix what looks like the usual awful AI that drives around in circles, gets lost and drives off the road - just as it always has)

[AG2590]

Originally posted by illgib:

Originally posted by AG2590:

AMD fanboy lol

Intel CPU and Nvidia GPU will always get you the highest stability and framrate.

Innovation and "half the price" is irrelevant. You want the best performance and willing to spend the top $ you go Intel + Nvidia.

Considering most game engines (and i bet Giants won't be any different since it's ancient) rarely use more than 1 or two cores, Amd was always much better on single core speed than Intel.

This is absolutely false.

[Skinny]

Originally posted by Blizzard:

Originally posted by AG2590:

Yep.

AMD has always been budget gaming. Naturally these people blame the game.

Intel fanboy lol

Edit:
Ryzen 7 7900X3D beats i9-13900KS in benchmarks at almost half the price, and its just Ryzen 7 and not 9. :skull:

Intel barely innovates nowadays, and just rides on its history. It keeps ripping off their users in terms of price to performance ratio.

My guy, until Intel steps up their game, and revisions their pricing, it will continue to be a bad value option.

When your Fiat is faster than a Porsche, it does not make it a Porsche :D

[Middy]

Originally posted by AG2590:

Yep.

AMD has always been budget gaming. Naturally these people blame the game.

Is your knowledge from 2004 or something? An AMD CPU with an Nvidia card has been a smart move for a long time now. It's the GPUs that lack developer support.

[shimsham29]

This is one of the stupidest things I have read in a while and that says a lot given it's the internet where stupid is everywhere.

AMD makes the best gaming CPUs and they work fine with Nvidia GPUs. What craziness to try and claim otherwise.

[AG2590]

Originally posted by Middy:

Originally posted by AG2590:

Yep.

AMD has always been budget gaming. Naturally these people blame the game.

Is your knowledge from 2004 or something? An AMD CPU with an Nvidia card has been a smart move for a long time now. It's the GPUs that lack developer support.

A smart move "money to performance ratio wise", sure. However, and the stats are the in solid black and white, a 14900KS beats out a 7950X3D.