Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
This, i hate this Anti-Tank rifle. When fully upgraded it can 2 hit kill any plane. Now just imagine that thing with a scope on it....
In my Opinion, the M1/M2 is even better at Range than the StG. Sure, it hits less Bullets, but it spits them out twiche as fast. And the Recoil isnt even noticable.
Or just make the 1919 better by removing the sights so people will quit incessantly saying the US NEEDS the M1/M2 because "der OP MG42". Better yet, buff the hell out of the 1918 and make it the tier 2 LMG for US and move the 1919 to tier one.
I think the addition of the assault rifle class was just a big mistake in the first place frankly.
Then, quit making more fantasy guns and camos and work on MAPS.
But I do agree with what you said rgr911, and honestly see you as one of the few voices of reason on these threads constantly. And you're also one of the few I actually trust with your actual knowledge of WW2 equipment in general.
The Soviets have the lowest population,
Germany has all the vets.
U.S has alot of bad players.
... To be honest i don't know exactly because this is just what i think.