Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
they should classify tanks according to year of production.
1939-1941, 1941-1943, 1943-1945
in that pattern panther introduced in 1943 would be put in last category and facing tanks like is-2 and pershing.
Problem is that shermans will still face superior german armor as tiger 1 is relatively old tank which entered service in 1942 the same year as sherman.
Also chaffee is 1944 so rejoice :)
Us tanks were just ♥♥♥♥ in terms of armor and armament but they werent as faulty as german or soviet tanks. Even british decided that 75mm is silly and upgraded to 17pounder
the same british which thought smgs are superficial and infantry can just form ranks to increase firepower.
I tought about extending your rank in the game to equipment you can use... So, you have some % of players that are on top of the list that would be in league of their own,.. Global Elite or Dimond or however its called and so on and as you gain rank you gain acess to the weapons too (Tiger for example is in second best class or whereever its succes rate puts it) and when you losse rank you losse the acess to those.. and while this works for games that have all their players on equal ground it works for this it wont work just like that, but if its implemented well,.. it would be something realy unique and from this perspective more immersive,.. since when you see Tiger you know its not some noob that bought its way in the game,.. whoops,.. thats the problem,.. back to drawing board
Not historically accurate in production and use, the T23 Pershing has a 76mm cannon, can fit as the tier 1 of the heavy tank for instance.
Otherwise we need two versions of the Jumbo, one with a weaker gun, another with a more powerful gun and better turret.
So yeah 75mm gun for medium Jumbo, and a 76mm gun and maybe even more armor, for a better variantion of Jumbo for heavy matches.
im pretty sure low tier soviet and german tanks would find it fair fighting it.
The reason why the 85mm gun isn't that great for the soviets is because Reto deems it.
Unless the Jumbo is going to be reduced in armor so low tier 75mm GE guns and 76mm SU guns can penetrate it frontally then i would agree with adding jumbo in medium tier.
While we are at it bring down the Pz3 and T-28 to lights (You should be ok with this if you care about balance for all factions, right?)
PS: The 85mm gun is actually pretty good, you forget its advantage of being able to have a guaranteed 2 shot ability. The 85mm gun has very high muzzle velocity (yes, it can shoot down planes too)
They involved tank destroyers to destroy tanks, they considered main battle tanks to be utilized for infantry support.
Granted, the US forces pretty much had a ton of towed anti-tank weaponry and artillery pieces as the main reason why they didn't bother to go with mass producing a tougher tank for a tank on tank brawl... Because they don't feel like having a fist fight when they can seek to win.
Had we not given up the anti-tank infantry class, we could have seen interesting vehicle options like a Towed artillery or anti-tank gun placements, or tank destroyer variants of existing vehicles (M3 GMC for instance).
You wanna know how the allies dealt with German tanks like the panther and Tiger II?
THEY FLANKED THEM.
But you want to go face to face against a Panther with a clearly inferior tank.
Guess what?
Not gonna work kid
Just another pointless thread with the stupid argument of "GERMANS ARE OP NERF NERF NERF :((( !!!111!".
-We just know how to use our equipment, unlike you.
This is not viable tactic.
Btw.. last war was
~500 wins for russians
~800 wins for Us
and ~1400 wins for Germany
although US won the war to me from a perspective of a soldier, we lost
Was that because of Panther, for some part, maybe,.. i dont have the stats, i think it is
https://heroesandgenerals.com/forums/topic/63065-tanks-guideperformanceweakspots/
Additional tip, US tanks have slowest shell velocity, so at distance they tend to arc, at long distance (or with some height, or combination of both) and with practice you can use this to either drop your shells on the roof/engine deck, or often the angle the shell comes in at is enough to conteract the angle of Panthers armour if you hit the upper glacis.
Good luck from another mainly US tanker, SU and GE on the side. :)