Just Cause 3

Just Cause 3

查看统计:
Moola 2015 年 12 月 16 日 下午 4:02
PARENT REVIEW FOR JC3
Hello, every parents job is simple. Protecting their kids. You don't need to protect your kids from Just cause3 as long as they are at least 10 years old. There is no nudity or sex scenes. Also, there is no alcohol or drug references. I haven't seen one in the game, but there might be the use of cigarettes. Gore/violence: Barely any blood, and there are uses of explosives...
Lastly profanity:
The f word is used twice, and the only other bad words are Sh*t and h*ll.
最后由 Moola 编辑于; 2015 年 12 月 16 日 下午 6:38
< >
正在显示第 16 - 24 条,共 24 条留言
Maxfarace 2015 年 12 月 16 日 下午 5:52 
引用自 LORD PROFESSORM0OLA
I see where your comming from. Yes it has shooting, but you think most parents actually allow games like this when their kids are 10. Now if parents don't like shooters, then they should not buy this game for their kids.
ya exactly
Bernkastel 2015 年 12 月 16 日 下午 6:04 
Apparently most of you are way too sensitive. I wouldn't say it is for 10-year-olds, though I'd be perfectly fine if they did play it (a LOT more appropriate than GTA V, which a TON of little children play, these days) -- but this game, like JC2, is more appropriate as being rated T for Teen. I am not sure what caused JC2 to gain an M rating -- and the only slightly reasonable argument for JC3's M rating is the use of the F-word thrice.

Likewise, I base this in comparison to the games Destroy All Humans and Destroy All Humans 2. Both were rated T, though you have the liberty of murdering INNOCENTS en masse with all sorts of weaponry -- not to mention the surplus of swearing. Whereas there were no F-bombs in either game, the S word was used frequently.

Based on ESRB's own past, JC2 should definitely qualify for T -- and JC3 is only slightly more in the grey.
Maxfarace 2015 年 12 月 16 日 下午 6:29 
Yea I think that ESRB should redo their whole rating system. I think that most M games should classify as 13 and up (such as the JC series) and games such as GTA should be rated M. Cuz GTA is beyond inappropriate and violent for kids. Honestly no one under 16/17 should be playing GTA. It's on it's own level of violent
最后由 Maxfarace 编辑于; 2015 年 12 月 16 日 下午 6:30
VicinalPlague 2015 年 12 月 16 日 下午 6:38 
引用自 LORD PROFESSORM0OLA
Hello, every parents job is simple. Protecting their kids. You don't need to protect your kids from Just cause3 as long as they are at least 10 years old. There is no nudity or sex scenes. Also, there is no alcohol or drug references. I haven't seen one in the game, but there might be the use of cigarettes. Gore/violence: Barely any blood, and there are uses of explosives...
Lastly profanity:
The f word is used twice, and the only other bad words are Sh*t and h*ll.
Hey ive been killing virtual people since 1995, i grew up went to college and didnt mass murder anyone, so dont be so skeptical. Being a good parent is what really matters.
VicinalPlague 2015 年 12 月 16 日 下午 6:38 
引用自 VicinalPlague
引用自 LORD PROFESSORM0OLA
Hello, every parents job is simple. Protecting their kids. You don't need to protect your kids from Just cause3 as long as they are at least 10 years old. There is no nudity or sex scenes. Also, there is no alcohol or drug references. I haven't seen one in the game, but there might be the use of cigarettes. Gore/violence: Barely any blood, and there are uses of explosives...
Lastly profanity:
The f word is used twice, and the only other bad words are Sh*t and h*ll.
Hey ive been killing virtual people since 1995, i grew up went to college and didnt mass murder anyone, so dont be so skeptical. Being a good parent is what really matters.
Wasnt actually meaning to reply to the author, dont take this as directly to you.
Azerate 2015 年 12 月 16 日 下午 8:13 
The thread is totally not surprising to me, many people suffer from the condition of believing that nudity/sex is somehow offensive, more than murder anyway. That's one of the things which are fundamentally wrong with the society these days.

But yeah, not that it matters. Children do play violent pc games and most of us could probably attest to that from our own experience (or am I wrong?). Adults stopping kids from purchasing a 16+ or 18+ is something that I almost never encountered in my life, but then again, perspectives may differ
Rich 2015 年 12 月 16 日 下午 9:17 
Imo, this game (or the entire series tbh) is too childish than it needed be. I get that its completely unrealistic and OTT, but if it had just a bit more serious tone at times - even while remaining unrealistic - it would have been so much better. Who wouldn't like to see some blood and gore for example? It enhances the gameplay!

I'm fairly certain this game wasn't originally intended to be a childs game, there are several indicators to that, such as dialogue and story relies on political satire for example, but somewhere down the line of development, they chose to go in a different direction, which is a shame imo.

Look at a game like GTA, it's not at all realistic, but it hasn't gone full ♥♥♥♥♥♥ either, like say Saints Row.

Imo, JC should move away from Saints Row and a bit more towards GTA.
SkapeGote 2015 年 12 月 16 日 下午 10:23 
引用自 LORD PROFESSORM0OLA
Hello, every parents job is simple. Protecting their kids. You don't need to protect your kids from Just cause3 as long as they are at least 10 years old. There is no nudity or sex scenes. Also, there is no alcohol or drug references. I haven't seen one in the game, but there might be the use of cigarettes. Gore/violence: Barely any blood, and there are uses of explosives...
Lastly profanity:
The f word is used twice, and the only other bad words are Sh*t and h*ll.

There is a mission where you deliver alcohol with Mario and he is drunk as a skunk.
Mysterion 2015 年 12 月 16 日 下午 11:57 
Some cool guy and Americans supporting 'moderate' rebels to overthrow the man in charge, sounds familiar.
Surely a good messaage for kids.
< >
正在显示第 16 - 24 条,共 24 条留言
每页显示数: 1530 50

发帖日期: 2015 年 12 月 16 日 下午 4:02
回复数: 24