Children of the Wasteland WTF!

[Brandybuck]

Okay, I'm trying out Children of the Wasteland for the first time, and I head over to Alicia's Cute Shop to buy some armor sets to see how to they look. And there's Alicia in a thong. A ten year old girl in a thong. WTF? Then I look over some of the outfits, and I see that most of them are skimpy sexualized anime crap that wholly inappropriate for children.

This stuff may fly in Japan where kids are considered sex objects, but I'm not in Japan, and this stuff is extremely creepy. I'm not a prude, but sexualizing children is too much.

So my question, is there a way to get rid of this stuff and just have the normal outfits and armors? Or is CotW one full package where you get the creepy pervy stuff along with the normal?

p.s. If you are thinking about berating me because I'm a prude who doesn't like sexualized children, don't bother replying.

[Hjelpmooglene]

Originally posted by Brandybuck:

p.s. If you are thinking about berating me because I'm a prude who doesn't like sexualized children, don't bother replying.

Lol. Ok, if you got this from the nexus. There should be a comment section, so looking there might help. If the mod is just a pack with multiple mods, maybe you could uncheck the skimpy outfits. Other than that, just uninstal the whole mod and look for a better one.

[Brandybuck]

It is a collection of three mods, one of which is the costume and armor. There is no separate "skimpy" mod that I can see. Without the costumes where is only the jumpsuit. All other stuff in the game is made for adults. Oh well. If no one has an answer, I supposed I could at least put a sensible outfit on the shopkeeper with GECK.

p.s. I noticed that the README says they don't accept any sexualized contributions. So I wonder how these costumes got in there.

[Morrandir]

I never use mods that fluck around with the children in the game, I usually tend to treat the kids as non existent, unless I have to interact with them like in little lamplight but other than that they are just some height depraved people as far as I am concerned :p

[Chad "The King" ThunderCuck]

if that offends you, you should see some of the ♥♥♥♥ on my game. loverslab dont ♥♥♥♥ around. well, they do. but they dont.

[davidb11]

I wouldn't go around insulting Japan, while complaining about something like this.
A bit mean-spirited.

This is a bit of a surprise for me too, I usually don't hear about sexualized children in mods for this game.
I'm not sure what happened to cause this.
I suggest reading the comment section on the Nexus for this mod.
I'd also suggest looking up on Google any issues people have had with this mod.

Since it says it doesn't accept sexualized clothing, something messed up.
And The King, no one needs to know about the stuff you have in your game. :)
And if it's worse than this, Chris Hensen needs to be called. :)

[Brandybuck]

Originally posted by Morrandir:

I never use mods that fluck around with the children in the game, I usually tend to treat the kids as non existent, unless I have to interact with them like in little lamplight but other than that they are just some height depraved people as far as I am concerned :p

Usually I would never consider playing a child, but in FO3 it can actually fit. You left the vault to find your dad, after all. I can't see it in FONV or any of the TES games, but it can work with FO3.

Originally posted by KINGS The King:

if that offends you, you should see some of the ♥♥♥♥ on my game. loverslab dont ♥♥♥♥ around. well, they do. but they dont.

Lovers Lab has a strict rule against children for obvious reasons. Sex does not offend me. Mods to simulate sex in the game don't offend me (although I won't use them), prostitution mods don't offend me, even the weird and wacky ♥♥♥♥♥♥ group bangs don't bother me. But children are a line that must not be crossed, for obvious reasons that shouldn't have to be explained.

[davidb11]

♥♥♥♥♥♥ group bangs? Okay, if someone made that mod, well, whatever floats their boat.
That seems a bit weird. :)

But yeah, sex doesn't bother me at all either.
Children though, are a line you cannot cross.

[Brandybuck]

Originally posted by davidb11:

I wouldn't go around insulting Japan, while complaining about something like this.
A bit mean-spirited.

Didn't mean to be insulting. It's just stuff I see in friends' mangas. I can definitely imagine someone defending the sexualization of children, because I've seen them do it in the context of anime. So I tried to forestall that discussion.

[Chad "The King" ThunderCuck]

Originally posted by Brandybuck:

Originally posted by Morrandir:

I never use mods that fluck around with the children in the game, I usually tend to treat the kids as non existent, unless I have to interact with them like in little lamplight but other than that they are just some height depraved people as far as I am concerned :p

Usually I would never consider playing a child, but in FO3 it can actually fit. You left the vault to find your dad, after all. I can't see it in FONV or any of the TES games, but it can work with FO3.

Originally posted by KINGS The King:

if that offends you, you should see some of the ♥♥♥♥ on my game. loverslab dont ♥♥♥♥ around. well, they do. but they dont.

Lovers Lab has a strict rule against children for obvious reasons. Sex does not offend me. Mods to simulate sex in the game don't offend me (although I won't use them), prostitution mods don't offend me, even the weird and wacky ♥♥♥♥♥♥ group bangs don't bother me. But children are a line that must not be crossed, for obvious reasons that shouldn't have to be explained.

keep telling yourself that. 60 years ago, youd be engaged to a 12 year old when she turned 8. besides you closet pedo, i never said anything about children. but if you think murder, cannibalism, and the rest of the stuff in this game are actually LESS disgusting and terrible than a simulated child looking character ina thong, you clearly have serious mental issues and should never procreate.

[davidb11]

Well, to me it kind of came across as insulting.
Sorry, I didn't mean to make a mountain out of a molehill there.
That's my bad.

[davidb11]

Originally posted by KINGS The King:

Originally posted by Brandybuck:

Usually I would never consider playing a child, but in FO3 it can actually fit. You left the vault to find your dad, after all. I can't see it in FONV or any of the TES games, but it can work with FO3.


Lovers Lab has a strict rule against children for obvious reasons. Sex does not offend me. Mods to simulate sex in the game don't offend me (although I won't use them), prostitution mods don't offend me, even the weird and wacky ♥♥♥♥♥♥ group bangs don't bother me. But children are a line that must not be crossed, for obvious reasons that shouldn't have to be explained.

keep telling yourself that. 60 years ago, youd be engaged to a 12 year old when she turned 8. besides you closet pedo, i never said anything about children. but if you think murder, cannibalism, and the rest of the stuff in this game are actually LESS disgusting and terrible than a simulated child looking character ina thong, you clearly have serious mental issues and should never procreate.

Wow, you're the most obvious troll ever.
Seriously, you attack him for no reason, over slights that make no sense to complain about.
You bring shame to us all.

[MAGNUS WAKER]

Originally posted by davidb11:

Originally posted by KINGS The King:

keep telling yourself that. 60 years ago, youd be engaged to a 12 year old when she turned 8. besides you closet pedo, i never said anything about children. but if you think murder, cannibalism, and the rest of the stuff in this game are actually LESS disgusting and terrible than a simulated child looking character ina thong, you clearly have serious mental issues and should never procreate.

Wow, you're the most obvious troll ever.
Seriously, you attack him for no reason, over slights that make no sense to complain about.
You bring shame to us all.

So someone actually reasons that violence is more acceptable in soceity than sex is (regardless of taboo) is more damaging and an indignation of humanity? How on Good Green Earth does that make any sense? Yes he worded it a bit aggressively but he had a bit of a point, people then did still kill and attack pedos but the rich got away with it. I'd rather have a child sexually abused and live then horribly tortured and killed. inb4 I'm banned for this view.

[davidb11]

I respectfully disagree that he ewas trying to point out anything resembling a coherent response. :)

Seriously, he attacked the OP, and mentioned things htat make no sense.

No one wants to see a child killed or abused. But what the hell does murdering adults have to do with children being abused?

Plus, this is about a video game where Chlidren can't even be killed.
Just because someone can survive sexual abuse doesn't mean it's actually better than murder.
That kind of logic is nonsensical. I can't even take anyone seriously with that argument.
You can't torture people if they're dead. I mean, that's kind of a well known fact. :)
How exactly is being tortured better than being killed.
If you're dead, you don't care about anything, because you're dead. You can't be hurt, you can't be tortured, you no longer feel pain,
Don't ever argue that being killed is worse than being tortured.


But this is not the forum for a debate on this subject at all.

Not to mention his rambling mess doesn't make sense, 60 years ago yolu never were engaged to children.
So, that really is silly to complain about.

Also, torture to kids is far worse than torture to adults, I think that's common sense. :)
Still though, no one ,under any circumstances should complain about another person being shocked/appaled/insulted/offended by children wearing clothing they should not wear.

Especially in a mod that says they don't sexualize children, and forbid it.
This is not the Dateline NBC To catch a Predator mod we're talking about here. :)

[MAGNUS WAKER]

Originally posted by davidb11:

I respectfully disagree that he ewas trying to point out anything resembling a coherent response. :)

Seriously, he attacked the OP, and mentioned things htat make no sense.

No one wants to see a child killed or abused. But what the hell does murdering adults have to do with children being abused?

Plus, this is about a video game where Chlidren can't even be killed.
Just because someone can survive sexual abuse doesn't mean it's actually better than murder.
That kind of logic is nonsensical.

But this is not the forum for a debate on this subject at all.

Not to mention his rambling mess doesn't make sense, 60 years ago yolu never were engaged to children.
So, that really is silly to complain about.

Also, torture to kids is far worse than torture to adults, I think that's common sense. :)
Still though, no one ,under any circumstances should complain about another person being shocked/appaled/insulted/offended by children wearing clothing they should not wear.

Especially in a mod that says they don't sexualize children, and forbid it.
This is not the Dateline NBC To catch a Predator mod we're talking about here. :)

No, the logic isn't nonsensical, it's controversial - I find that the general loss of life is much more terrifying, I've seen children being shot, beheaded and generally kicked and beaten up on Liveleak. Stuff that makes you sick to your stomach but we find resolve, we adapt and find hopre.

It hurts others than taking down the pedophile ♥♥♥♥♥ that molest and ♥♥♥♥ the kids - I don't support those ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ that do it, they need to be put in jail for life for abusing them but if a genuinely romantic relationship (with or without sex) between different ages happen and they do consent on both sides, a practice in Japan between distant cousins and very commonly in the UK (where teen pregs have occured) are aware of the consent and sex itself - why should the older or equally-aged one be punished if he follows proper procedure?

It's sex, the very thing that gives life why should we alienate it? If you do it right (condom and et al) enjoy it, if you abuse or do it wrong, then it should be punished accordingly.

It's the exact same negative media influence that prevents this ♥♥♥♥ in Western videogames. Remember when GTA;SA had hot coffee, that was tame as ♥♥♥♥, with bearly any nudity (if at all) and positions that make CJ look like an old man having sex for the first time, it's more hilarious than off-putting. A child wearing a thong in a place that is run-down where clothing itself, theme-wise is no longer a commodity but a rarity? Hell, in some places in real life children are completely naked with clothes being considered a gift or presents. I can't remember where tho.

Mental wounds can be mended by new memories, yes, they will remember the horrible past but that's our inherent flaw, we need to move on. And not a place of debate? Are you dense as ♥♥♥♥ or something, it's a discussion forum for Fallout 3. Yeah we went off-topic here but a discussion nevertheless.

[davidb11]

This is not the place for the debate you want to get into, because it brings into this discussion something far beyond this game.
If you want to talk about something in the game, or mods, tha'ts fine, but real life stuff is not soemthing you talk about in a forum dedicated to a game where radiation doesn't even work like it does in real life, and there are Deathclaws who came from Jackson Chamleons. :)


And this all started because of an insult made by someone else.
This is a forum for Fallout 3, in a discussion about a mod that had bad clothing.

Sexualizing children is wrong, period. That's not up for debate.
If you want to talk about why murder is worse than abuse and torture, go to another discussion, and not one dedicated to mods in Fallout 3.
Okay?

That's why I said this is not the discussion for it, and saying I'm dense as crap makes no sense, that insult literally is the silliest insult ever.
Crap isn't dense. Compared to a lot of other things.

The point of discussion here is the mod said it does not sexualize children, and something sexualizes children in it. That is contridictive, and needs to be fixed/adjusted.
A thong is not clothing you wear randomly for no reason.

I'm not sure why you had to go all this way overboard here. I don't see the need,
No one is trying to ban nudity, or sex in games, so your GTA examples don't work here.