Going over 60fps break the game. Everything happens really fast.

[Wolf]

Any way to play over 60 fps without breaking the game?
Can't find a mod to fix this like on Fallout 4.
Tale of Two Wastelands fix this?
I don't care about visual or changing gameplay i just want to play with higher fps.

[-={LG}=-]

It's a Bethesda game, which means the physics is tied directly to the framerate. You have to lock the FPS to 60.

[Wolf]

Originally posted by -={LG}=-:

It's a Bethesda game, which means the physics is tied directly to the framerate. You have to lock the FPS to 60.

https://www.nexusmods.com/fallout4/mods/44798

Fallout 4 u can use this and play over 60 no problem, i just can't find this for fallout 3.

[Stan]

Originally posted by Wolf:

Originally posted by -={LG}=-:

It's a Bethesda game, which means the physics is tied directly to the framerate. You have to lock the FPS to 60.

https://www.nexusmods.com/fallout4/mods/44798

Fallout 4 u can use this and play over 60 no problem, i just can't find this for fallout 3.

Fallout 4 uses newer engine too. Fallout 3 runs on oblivion engine.

[UsernameTaken666]

Huh. That IS weird. Good luck fixing it.

[Mechwarrior94]

This game was made before you even could go over 60 FPS. Most games that are that old or older will do the same. Lock the game into doing 60 FPS and it should be fine.

[forth]

Yes Lossless Scaling. Get 120 fps with frame gen.

https://store.steampowered.com/app/993090/Lossless_Scaling/

[Mae]

If you follow the best of times TTW guide it includes New Vegas tick fix, which allows you to go up to 120 safely I believe.

[-={LG}=-]

Originally posted by Wolf:

Fallout 4 u can use this and play over 60 no problem, i just can't find this for fallout 3.

Nah, I use High FPS Physics Fix in Fallout 4 and despite what they claim you still have problems if you go over 60. I got glitches running Fallout 4 at 75 even. Works perfectly now that I locked it back to 60 with the mod's config file.

Lots of folks claim they can let you run Bethesda games over 60, but I've never found any of them that are 100%

[Wolf]

Originally posted by forth:

Yes Lossless Scaling. Get 120 fps with frame gen.

https://store.steampowered.com/app/993090/Lossless_Scaling/

Frame genaration is trash, more fps but the actual latency dron't improve, don't feel smoother or easy to aim.
I have a 4070 RTX+165hz 1ms monitor and it sucks on every game i try.

[Wolf]

Originally posted by Mae:

If you follow the best of times TTW guide it includes New Vegas tick fix, which allows you to go up to 120 safely I believe.

Great gona try TTW than.

[forth]

Originally posted by Wolf:

Originally posted by forth:

Yes Lossless Scaling. Get 120 fps with frame gen.

https://store.steampowered.com/app/993090/Lossless_Scaling/

Frame genaration is trash, more fps but the actual latency dron't improve, don't feel smoother or easy to aim.
I have a 4070 RTX+165hz 1ms monitor and it sucks on every game i try.

No issues here 7900XTX with latest drivers. Works for me.
You could always Git Gud : D

[Wolf]

Originally posted by forth:

Originally posted by Wolf:

Frame genaration is trash, more fps but the actual latency dron't improve, don't feel smoother or easy to aim.
I have a 4070 RTX+165hz 1ms monitor and it sucks on every game i try.

No issues here 7900XTX with latest drivers. Works for me.
You could always Git Gud : D

Frame generation stinks; prove is no one would ever use it on a competitive shooter.

More frames don't mean smoother game play if latency/delay/etc is actually worse.

I have a 165 Hz monitor; going from 80 to 160 feels amazing, but if I get this with frame generation, it actually feel slower to turn the mouse.

If u have a +144hz monitor try lock to 70fps and than lock to 144fps and see how it feels. Than try going from 70 to 144 with frame generation, u gona see running fake frames sucks.

[-={LG}=-]

Originally posted by Wolf:

Frame generation stinks; prove is no one would ever use it on a competitive shooter.

From what I've heard serious competitive players still use 1080p. I'm not a competitive anything, but I still use 1080p myself. I don't ever want to get into all that gimmicky upscaling and frame generation and whatever.

A 12-gig 4070 and a 32" 165 Hz curved 1080p monitor looks very good to me. And I didn't have to mortgage the house to buy it. I can run darn near everything on Ultra, and the fans don't even spin up most times.

If some game makes the fans start whirring, I just lock the FPS to 100.

[Wolf]

Originally posted by -={LG}=-:

Originally posted by Wolf:

Frame generation stinks; prove is no one would ever use it on a competitive shooter.

From what I've heard serious competitive players still use 1080p. I'm not a competitive anything, but I still use 1080p myself. I don't ever want to get into all that gimmicky upscaling and frame generation and whatever.

A 12-gig 4070 and a 32" 165 Hz curved 1080p monitor looks very good to me. And I didn't have to mortgage the house to buy it. I can run darn near everything on Ultra, and the fans don't even spin up most times.

If some game makes the fans start whirring, I just lock the FPS to 100.

My point is that the frame rate doesn't improve the response time or the feeling of smoother gameplay you get from a normal, higher frame rate.

60 normal frames running 120 with frame generation still feel and respond like 60 or worse and look bad, so it is pointless.

The only thing that changed is that the fps counter showed a higher number. The most useless tech ever invented.