Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
I own it on the Xbox One. Open your eyes sonny.
In my experience here and on other non-gaming forums, the BIGGEST TROLLS are those that throw around the overused and frankly rather pathetic "crybaby", "whining" "fools" etc.
You sir are an A-Grade troll.
Feedback is what drives developers to improve. It gives US, the gamers, better games, more enjoyment, and better value for money.
If you have trouble grasping these basic concepts and arguing the actual point in question, all you have done is waste your own time and embarrass yourself.
Think for more than 2 seconds and have another try.
Surprised you lowered yourself to petty insults Prime. Have a better day tomorrow friend :p
Feedback huh? How are any of your posts constructive feedback? Lets look at them:
Classic, a troll calling someone else a troll. You have provided exactly nothing to this discussion other than vitriol, ignorance, and a piss-poor attitude. Oh, and how is it up on that soap box?
I actually addressed points on how what you and others are asking for is not feasible. You have utterly failed to counter those points. Based on your posts, you have lead me to believe you are ignorant of how software is developed, networking, DRM, client/server communication and a wealth of other topics, and thus aren't even capable of intelligently arguing this issue. Yet you some how have the nerve to claim you have a solution, but you just aren't able to explain it . . .
lol, wut?
Kettle, meet pot. Please go to the Xbox forums with the other console kiddies.
Usually I'd expand on my remarks on page 1 and get a bit more technical, but the more toxic the thread gets, the less I want to. I find it difficult to even post this much in such a negative thread again.
The leaderbord-cheating is a difficult issue to fix - not easy, as you say, greg. And if you aren't even willing to argue that point (as you apparently have other ideas there, but just state it, without backing it up), your ad-hominems will only earn you either scorn or silence.
As its been stated by various folks on the post, its very difficult to create a cheat free leaderboard, so we can hope that something may happen in the future.
I'm still enjoying the game and will hopefully put in the same number of hours I did with the original.
Oh well.. Probably won't play much after getting all the achieves with nothing else to aim for.
Try to get top-100 in all the maps. I guarantee you that there are many legitimate players in top-100 of every map & type.
The first solver submitted a solution consisting of 79.000 steps; validation of the solution took 7 minutes (their validator software was fast-running the steps).
================
The reason why I'm listing it here is because this COULD work for DG-style game, and, unlike other methods of anti-cheat protection, it would not evolve into the above mentioned "arms-race": If anyone wanting to claim that they scored 1 Gazzillion points would have to submit a "high-score file" (which could be as uncomplicated as clicking a button "Submit score for verification", and then waiting for 500 KBs of data to be transmitted), then there would be nothing to hack or cheat: HPE would simply automatically validate the contents of the file (which could be a recording of mouse-clicks/tower-related actions). Since the game is deterministic, this should be possible.
The validator would simply validate any super-high-score files (let's say any score which is above 95% of the current top score), so that it doesn't have to validate every single high-score, just those which would make sense to hack.
And if, by any chance, some hacker manages to actually program a BOT that solves a level without human input, then KUDOS I SAY! :-)
Moreover, ban cheaters gamekey + disable steam account for a while :D
It is still more complicated to do for a game like DG (where exact input times matter) than for example a turn-based game, but it could be made to work.
Not sure it is worth the (big) effort. Still, kudos for coming up with a workable solution.
While I understand cheaters are annoying, they do serve an important function in our overly-computerized society - they show us areas where our infrastructure is lacking in security. If we punish cheaters too harshly, we will drive them into secrecy, where they are more likely to wait and prepare to "strike". Trust me, you wouldn't want to be the Prime Minister having to explain to an enraged nation that after you've spent millions on the preparation of electronic election system, you can throw the results out the window, because there was a huge security hole and anyone could have rigged the elections by "disabling cookies" or some such. It is much better when in the world of gaming, the concepts of IT security can be tested and improved, before being deployed into serious real-life things.
Why not just get rid of leaderboards? They are POINTLESS.
To be fair DifferentThanThis said close to the same thing.