Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Tri-coupler, quad-coupler
Okay, yeah I think this is the problem. I did some tests, and yeah the fairing blasts horizontally on these engines, knocking off each other off in a tri-coupler or quad-coupler set up.
If you can, mount them radially using some small fuel tanks. That way you won't have to use decouplers.
Yeah, I made a rocket with that idea. Works well. Going to the new Mun for the first time with this lander.
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=163807244
my last eve rover delivery in 0.20 had 12 nervas, 6 of the plane engine nassells, each with a bicoupler on it.
this makes is safe to add a decoupler while still adding more engines.
bottom line: only use a decoupler on a tank or a single engine, the bi-tri-quad couplers aren't upposed to be coupled like that (not the stock ones at lease)
The strength of the decoupler force also determines how much explosive force is exerted. Using smaller decouplers can help reduce that.
Image of how I am connecting them.
http://imgur.com/V5p3oeh
Not sure if it's a real solution or just happened coincidentally both times.