Інсталювати Steam
увійти
|
мова
简体中文 (спрощена китайська)
繁體中文 (традиційна китайська)
日本語 (японська)
한국어 (корейська)
ไทย (тайська)
Български (болгарська)
Čeština (чеська)
Dansk (данська)
Deutsch (німецька)
English (англійська)
Español - España (іспанська — Іспанія)
Español - Latinoamérica (іспанська — Латинська Америка)
Ελληνικά (грецька)
Français (французька)
Italiano (італійська)
Bahasa Indonesia (індонезійська)
Magyar (угорська)
Nederlands (нідерландська)
Norsk (норвезька)
Polski (польська)
Português (португальська — Португалія)
Português - Brasil (португальська — Бразилія)
Română (румунська)
Русский (російська)
Suomi (фінська)
Svenska (шведська)
Türkçe (турецька)
Tiếng Việt (в’єтнамська)
Повідомити про проблему з перекладом
That would give you the best "time in the air".
http://cdn.ymaservices.com/editorial_service/media/images/000/044/202/original/Water-bottle-rocket.jpg.jpg?1404215259
I don't expect there will be any meaningful gliding. You can try to make an airplane-like shape but good luck maintaining a steady glide. What I would make is a simple, traditional fins-on-the-back design that flies straight up and has minimal drag to keep the rocket oriented upward, but then make the fins fold over in a way that imparts spin spin as the rocket comes back down.
This is where that shape comes in to play. It's pentagonal, but also essentially a square and triangle sharing an edge. The pentagon should be a single piece of paper or card stock but the shared edge between the triangular and square parts would be a crease. The fins would be connected to the body only along the triangular portion. That is, the square parts are free to swing along the crease. Travelling upward, air resistance can keep the fins straight but on he way down (assuming it comes down backwards), the crease would swing the other way and impart a spin along the rocket's primary axis. You might need to weight the cap end to encourage a proper descent attitude and you might need to apply a small amount of spring force to help the fins articulate consistently. But with a little testing and tuning, it might blow away the competition.
I was thinking about using aerofoils in a single-helical trajectory configuration (like maple seeds or common emergency flares) for the descent in lieu of a parachute. Remember that both parachutes and gliders depend on a mass to generate lifting forces and counter gravitational forces.
The lifting surfaces should be designed such that the payload's weight is fairly balanced with the induced drag of the sail/glider. Too large a wing/parachute will cause it too fall faster through the air with less resistance (due to lack of an applied force acting as thrust), and too little will have the same effect.