Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Now, that being said, I DO still have about a Third of a FL-T100 after getting into a 100km orbit with a small probe, so It feel like they are good for at least getting INTO orbit, But how they compare, if if they actually are fuel guzzlers, I can't seem to find.
I was actually starting to think of them as cheating...
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=388922658
Put this one into a 90K orbit on the first stage with fuel left using the SABRE M engine x 2.
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=388922772
Same payload and same fuel load using conventional rockets. Entered orbit having jetisoned the first stage and used 1/3 of the orbiter's fuel.
Both rockets had roughly the same thrust sans boosters. 1400Kn.
Both work, the SABRE engines are more fuel efficiant and the conventional rocket is cheeper.
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=388931896
Same payload. One SABRE M and 1/2 the fuel of the original. One stage to orbit. Cost roughly 3k more than the conventional rocket. Now, it's slow getting up there, but it is very effcient doing it.
Under structural TVR-200. There are two three and 4 pod versions. BTW I had to use tweakscale to get the engines to fit as the TVR-200 is 1.25 M scale and the SABRE M is 2.5 M.
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=388946663
Only change is adding more air intakes. 16 more to be exact. Going from 8 intakes to 24 did one thing. It meant that my SABRE switched over to rocket mode LATER in the flight. With 8 intakes it switched modes at 27km. At 24 intakes it switched at 34km. This translates to 11 seconds more burn time with the main stage once in orbit. For a 1100% increase
I find that intakes are NOT linear in progression. From 8 intakes to 16 I gained about 4500 metres before mode switch, but from 16 to 24 I only gained an additional 2500 metres.