Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Usually I agree on somewhat heavy crafts (as almost every space plane), but when the aircraft is no that heavy, cantilever wings usually have a better lift/drag ratio - at least, on the crafts I do.
Interesting enough... My cargo planes are all (until this moment) high cantilever wings (lower wings are more unstable, and a cumbersome when loading cargo most of the time). But I never tried a high delta-wing for cargo planes before... Something to try out.
For planetary craft ( on kerbin or similar) these are incredibly stable and you can get some pretty cool looking craft by just rotating them back a touch.
T tails can also be pretty nice in combination with those long skinny lightweight wings (which looks like it's somewhere between the wing of a F104 and that of a U2). However, the delta and swept lifting body V or U is far better as speeds go well above mach 2. So this arrangement is better for airliners and airplanes, and less suited usually for spaceplanes.
At speeds near stall higher angle of attack of flight surfaces such as these trailing parts don't increase the lift... you actually get less lift and just extra drag. So (if flapperons are your only roll control surfaces) using the flight stick to roll right actually rolls you in the opposite direction (left) plus yaws you to the side on which you want to lift the wing.