Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
Yeah you've never played RSSRO
I wouldn't go so far as to accuse the poster of not playing RSS+RO, but I agree with the sentiment. Obviously the math is basically the same - it's physics afterall. Saying that the math is basically the same though, is not very helpful and somewhat disingenuous in my opinion though.
For an example, and why I suggested just getting to orbit, or doing a moon flyby is because, unlike stock KSP, your launch facility isn't on the equator. Your planet has some tilt. The moon's orbit is also inclined relative to the solar system plane as well. And yes, all these extra complications (plus the real physics of principia) definitely changed my launches a lot.
Also, I agree that the use of limited ignition, limited throttle, ullage sensitive rocket motors and fuel tanks also made a difference to my launch strategy.
First you can start to build a network around earth and expand it beyond the moon to even have a good connection without delay. Dont use any kerbals.
For Mars? It has an atmosphere. It'll be fine particles, probably really corrosive, but I highly doubt it'd have sharp dust.
If you'd have said Moon, then ♥♥♥♥ yeah I agree, that place is apparently a coal mine according to Apollo 12. I found it amusing that the dust rendered the lunar rover's dials absolutely useless.
I laughed a little harder when I read about Apollo 17 and their geologist throwing away a hammer that had been corroded into uselessness. I think he was also the guy that tripped over, scratched his helmet and got occasionally blinded by the sun
1) Beat NASA in budget and time and have a manned Moon landing before '65 (year 15)
2) Get a probe into orbit around Mercury
3) Do a manned Mars landing and return
4) Do a manned Titan landing and return (no cryo tech BS, you gotta carry supplies for the entire duration). Also, no mining and refining CH4 on Titan!
On stock game:
- do everything you've done before but starting from a polar orbit around Kerbin (inclination 85-95)!
a) Mun orbit/ landing and return
b) Duna/ Eve
c) Moho/ Jool / Eeloo
Super bonus: also return to Kerbin from a polar orbit around these bodies :)
Did you go for Saturn with all those assists Cassini did (2xVenus, Earth, Jupiter)? It's 7 years in one direction, how did your astronauts survive that? :)
a) I'm not gonna wait from the 50s until almost present to get those perfect fly-bys. I like to beat NASA on budget and time, finishing every manned mission to the Moon in early 1953 with much less costs per launch (~22 000 Kerbal $ / one man landing). You can get 5t to Saturn directly even without upgrading the launch pad above 800t with the proper engine upgrades. Capture around Saturn is ~600 dV from low periapsis (atmosphere touching low). The annoyance is when trying to do fly-bys of all the moons on one mission. But I have another strat: I get my initial periapsis around the altitude of the target moon and use fly-bys to go low from initial capture (which can now be 1000-1500 dV). This way, I can land on the moons, I can even get a rover there. Almost all don't have an atmoshpere and the landings are Moon-like, slightly easier.
b) Those supplies wheigh so friggin much, man! And then again, there's a lot to be done in the inner system before waiting so many years.
I consider polar orbits special because you need more fuel and more careful trajectory planning.