Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
Play Quake 3 on that.
After having thought about it some more, I used to play games in 1280x960, but i think that was early 2000's.
http://www.cnet.com/products/hansol-900p-crt-monitor-19-series/
It was high(ish)-end for 2000, about £600-£700 at the time.
I had a something or other Flatface monitor running 120hz at 1600x1200, but in game you would go way lower to get some better FPS.
In "competative" games you would even go to the lowest to gain some more FPS advantage over the others.
Mid res - 640x480, 800x600
High res - 1024x786, 1280x960, 1280x1024
Top res - 1600x1200
These were late 90s PC gaming resolution standards. Something like "VGA" (640x480) or "SVGA" (800x600) would have been seen as "high-res" in the mid 90s, prior to the "3D accelerator" revolution, with "CGA" (320x200) being the standard.
And in 2000 there was Sony GDM-FW900 with 2304x1440.
Then in 2004 you could even have 2560x1600 with Apple Cinema monitor.