Chivalry: Medieval Warfare

Chivalry: Medieval Warfare

View Stats:
Ankkah Jan 18, 2013 @ 10:22am
Flanged Mace vs. Morningstar
I've seen some posts on here and the official forums which were praising the Morningstar. Since then I played a few TO matches with it and went back to the Flanged Mace.

Can anyone tell me the hype behind the Morningstar? I did way better with the FM than MS (as a MAA). 2 hit kills on Vanguards if I manage to get behind them and open up with a headstrike, which I somehow failed to do with the MS. 3 hit kills Knights, or 4 if I hit a leg, something I had trouble to do with the MS.

So did I just have a bad run? Did I do something wrong or not play long enough? Everything the MS can do I have (so far) done better with the FM.
< >
Showing 1-2 of 2 comments
CuddleBundles Jan 18, 2013 @ 10:44am 
The Morning Star is Longer, Yet Sliiiightly slower than the normal mace.
I prefer The mace, Actually. Usually I can get enough hits on someone before they can block or react.
(And No LMB spamming, No matter how effective it is..)
Last edited by CuddleBundles; Jan 18, 2013 @ 10:45am
OrkDork Jan 18, 2013 @ 11:50am 
It varies, personally I think they're both good enough in their own ways to just come down to preference and the situation. I switch it up between them all the time.
< >
Showing 1-2 of 2 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Jan 18, 2013 @ 10:22am
Posts: 2