DLC worth it?

[Larios]

Played this game for 58 hours and i really enjoy it. I just wanted to know if it's worth to get the DLC.

[Mikal]

I heard it sucks but I'll still buy it when I got the money, I want to throw money at this game, aslong as it keeps getting better.

[Crusader King]

No it's beyond ♥♥♥♥♥.

[Larios]

Darramouss님이 먼저 게시:

No it's beyond ♥♥♥♥♥.

Can you explain why?D:

[Chibi]

Larios님이 먼저 게시:

Darramouss님이 먼저 게시:

No it's beyond ♥♥♥♥♥.

Can you explain why?D:

He can't provide a valid reason. DW is good, if you like fast paced, non sluggish action, and the diversity of classes. You must be a fan of at least one class though, in order to enjoy it and fully invest into the gameplay. If not, don't bother. Also, it's easy to find servers anytime and my average laptop with intel 4000HD graphics runs it fine, with fancy settings.

[Wolfgang421]

Deadliest Warrior is fun, if a bit gimmicky. It can be fun, certainly, but I find that it plays a bit different from the base game - combat is quicker, team work is different, archers don't as easily dominate, etc. I got it on sale for something like 3.75 USD, and feel I got more than enough game for my money. Your experiences may vary, and I recommend either getting it on the cheap to be sure.

[Larios]

Got it for 4 euro, i'm downloading it actually. I hope i'll like it, thanks for the help.

[Crusader King]

Larios님이 먼저 게시:

Darramouss님이 먼저 게시:

No it's beyond ♥♥♥♥♥.

Can you explain why?D:

Clunky jerky animations
Limited game modes
Horrible stereoype voice acting
Classes that don't mix at all
Hardly anyone playing

[Chibi]

Clunky jerky animations
Clunky? jerky? Please explain that.

Limited game modes
The only game mode missing from the original is Team Objective, which isn't a big deal at all.
Also, some game modes from DW were ported to the last patch in MW because they were better.

Horrible stereoype voice acting
Based off hollywood movies, meant to be goofy, just like the main game.

Classes that don't mix at all
What do you mean?

Hardly anyone playing
Wrong.

[Crusader King]

DUST님이 먼저 게시:

Clunky jerky animations
Clunky? jerky? Please explain that.

Limited game modes
The only game mode missing from the original is Team Objective, which isn't a big deal at all.
Also, some game modes from DW were ported to the last patch in MW because they were better.

Horrible stereoype voice acting
Based off hollywood movies, meant to be goofy, just like the main game.

Classes that don't mix at all
What do you mean?

Hardly anyone playing
Wrong.

TO is the most popular game mode in MW, which is why many more people play it over DW. If you don't knwo what clunky or jerky means then I can't converse with an ape.

[Chibi]

Darramouss님이 먼저 게시:

DUST님이 먼저 게시:

Clunky jerky animations
Clunky? jerky? Please explain that.

Limited game modes
The only game mode missing from the original is Team Objective, which isn't a big deal at all.
Also, some game modes from DW were ported to the last patch in MW because they were better.

Horrible stereoype voice acting
Based off hollywood movies, meant to be goofy, just like the main game.

Classes that don't mix at all
What do you mean?

Hardly anyone playing
Wrong.

TO is the most popular game mode in MW, which is why many more people play it over DW. If you don't knwo what clunky or jerky means then I can't converse with an ape.

Thanks for that very useful conversation, hope the OP enjoys his new game :)

[=(e)= Lemonater47]

As an alpha tester while the game is balanced for proper combat it isn't for team objective. As soon as you add objectives then it gets unbalanced. All classes are miles better at defending than any of them are attacking. Single class TO was horrible. Open class TO still heavily favoured the defenders. The map was simple but was changed tons and the odds out heavily in the attackers favour. But that way it meant they would either steamroll or be held in the first objective. There was no middle ground and it wouldn't be interesting.