Games like chivalry?

[Gork]

Any medieval games that require some skill? I am asking since this game is practically dead.

I've checked out all the games you guys recommended me and i am extremely excited towards the release of mordhau. Thanks for introducing me to it.

[Average Jeanne d'Arc Enjoyer]

Originally posted by Nappev:

Originally posted by Kaiayos:

Peer to peer isn't a bad system, and as I recall, a majority of fighting games use P2P.
Microtransactions are optional, and most people never touch them.

Keep in mind, console has both P2P and microtransactions as well.
But while the numbers are much lower on PC, they are nowhere near the stuff those "For Honor is dead" articles will tell you.

It isnt dead, but will be unless they dont change

Have you been watching the dev streams recently?

[Moist Potato]

Originally posted by Kaiayos:

Originally posted by Athena:

There is also a console version which is more popular, the PC version is a different story mainly because of P2P and horrible microtransactions.

Peer to peer isn't a bad system, and as I recall, a majority of fighting games use P2P.
Microtransactions are optional, and most people never touch them.

Keep in mind, console has both P2P and microtransactions as well.
But while the numbers are much lower on PC, they are nowhere near the stuff those "For Honor is dead" articles will tell you.

P2P works well when the other people aren't using a potato. But when you fight someone with ♥♥♥♥♥♥ internet/pc issues arise. Luckly with their different system that doesn't effect fighting the other players. But still is annoying.

[DJ Dumbas]

Originally posted by Kaiayos:

Originally posted by Nappev:

It isnt dead, but will be unless they dont change

Have you been watching the dev streams recently?

no? why?

[Average Jeanne d'Arc Enjoyer]

Originally posted by Nappev:

Originally posted by Kaiayos:

Have you been watching the dev streams recently?

no? why?

Cause they just talked about huge changes coming to the game, all are to be tested in the next PTR. Apparently, next week, there will be even bigger news than this week.

[DJ Dumbas]

Originally posted by Kaiayos:

Originally posted by Nappev:

no? why?

Cause they just talked about huge changes coming to the game, all are to be tested in the next PTR. Apparently, next week, there will be even bigger news than this week.

good, hope theyre going to the right direction

[Nikita]

Originally posted by Kaiayos:

Originally posted by Athena:

There is also a console version which is more popular, the PC version is a different story mainly because of P2P and horrible microtransactions.

Peer to peer isn't a bad system, and as I recall, a majority of fighting games use P2P.
Microtransactions are optional, and most people never touch them.

Keep in mind, console has both P2P and microtransactions as well.
But while the numbers are much lower on PC, they are nowhere near the stuff those "For Honor is dead" articles will tell you.

That's an excuse people have been using trying to justify the P2P system, For Honor isn't a fighting game it's a fast paced melee game and as I remember M&B doesn't have P2P, neither does Chivalry or Mirage, I doubt Mordhau and Bannerlord will have it. The numbers and complaints speak for itself. It also killed CoD on PC, no one wants to play a game to then get migrating hosts to pop up 5 times a game which kills the flow of the entire gameplay and on top of that very inconsistent connections when someone has bad internet etc.

[Average Jeanne d'Arc Enjoyer]

Originally posted by Athena:

Originally posted by Kaiayos:

Peer to peer isn't a bad system, and as I recall, a majority of fighting games use P2P.
Microtransactions are optional, and most people never touch them.

Keep in mind, console has both P2P and microtransactions as well.
But while the numbers are much lower on PC, they are nowhere near the stuff those "For Honor is dead" articles will tell you.

That's an excuse people have been using trying to justify the P2P system, For Honor isn't a fighting game it's a fast paced melee game and as I remember M&B doesn't have P2P, neither does Chivalry or Mirage, I doubt Mordhau and Bannerlord will have it. The numbers and complaints speak for itself. It also killed CoD on PC, no one wants to play a game to then get migrating hosts to pop up 5 times a game which kills the flow of the entire gameplay and on top of that very inconsistent connections when someone has bad internet etc.

It's not an excuse.
It's what the people who understand how the connectivity works tell to the people who complain, "When will Ubisoft get dedicated servers??!!!", because dedicated servers will not fix connectivity issues.

[Adinbei]

Mordhau will release, and we will all flock to it, marvelous times ahead.

[sealthatisgolden]

Chivalry isn't completley dead, there are still enough players and a good community.

[post apocalypse otter boi]

Honestly why are people even suggesting for honor? That would be like saying a good alternative to double dragon is street fighter. For honot is built upon 1v1 and as such it is a poor subsitute for chivalry. If you like the large scale of chivalry you won't like for honor. While for honor does have 3v3, it is not built for anything beyound 1v1 and you can see that with the stupid for anything but 1v1 lock on system.

[DJ Dumbas]

Originally posted by RNP #2451:

Chivalry isn't completley dead, there are still enough players and a good community.

[Rowdy Ronin]

Chivalry isant dead at all. Usualy about 1k people on at any given time.

[76561198376076866]

dark souls 2

[Average Jeanne d'Arc Enjoyer]

Originally posted by Punished_Penguini:

Honestly why are people even suggesting for honor? That would be like saying a good alternative to double dragon is street fighter. For honot is built upon 1v1 and as such it is a poor subsitute for chivalry. If you like the large scale of chivalry you won't like for honor. While for honor does have 3v3, it is not built for anything beyound 1v1 and you can see that with the stupid for anything but 1v1 lock on system.

For Honor's competitive future is dependent on its 4v4 modes, specifically Dominion.

[post apocalypse otter boi]

Originally posted by Kaiayos:

Originally posted by Punished_Penguini:

Honestly why are people even suggesting for honor? That would be like saying a good alternative to double dragon is street fighter. For honot is built upon 1v1 and as such it is a poor subsitute for chivalry. If you like the large scale of chivalry you won't like for honor. While for honor does have 3v3, it is not built for anything beyound 1v1 and you can see that with the stupid for anything but 1v1 lock on system.

For Honor's competitive future is dependent on its 4v4 modes, specifically Dominion.

That is stupid. The game is obviously not made for anything greater than 1v1. And even so you cannot compare the 4v4 of for honor to the large scale combat of chiveraly